Jones M E, Mondy L W
School of Nursing, University of Texas, Arlington 76019.
J Adolesc Health Care. 1990 Sep;11(5):437-44. doi: 10.1016/0197-0070(90)90092-g.
This study evaluated the effects of lessons taught by trained nonprofessional volunteers in community prenatal clinics. Project participants (n = 210) and comparison subjects (n = 189) were pregnant women, aged 18 years or younger. Participants were divided according to those who attended eight or more lessons (high treatment, n = 94) and those who attended fewer lessons (n = 116). A system of rewards for attendance was used. The number of prenatal visits was significantly different between the three groups (p less than 0.001), with the high-treatment participants having a significantly greater number of visits than the other groups. The groups differed on gestational age at delivery (p less than 0.006), favoring the infants of high-treatment participants; however, only 8% of gestational age variance was attributable to prenatal visits. A significantly greater proportion of high-treatment participants returned for postpartum care (p less than 0.011 vs. low-treatment participants, p less than 0.002 vs. comparison subjects). Postpartum return was not improved by a hospital visit by a volunteer. Regardless of treatment, most (99%) accepted a contraceptive method at their postpartum visit. The groups did not differ on their return for method check at 3 months. However, a significantly greater proportion of the high-treatment participants returned for an annual family planning evaluation (p less than 0.015 vs. low-treatment participants, p less than 0.005 vs. comparison subjects). Both the high- and low-treatment participants differed significantly from the comparison subjects on having taken their infants for at least one well-child visit during the first year (p less than 0.001 for both tests).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究评估了社区产前诊所中由经过培训的非专业志愿者授课的课程效果。项目参与者(n = 210)和对照对象(n = 189)为18岁及以下的孕妇。参与者根据参加课程数量分为参加8节或更多课程的(高治疗组,n = 94)和参加课程较少的(n = 116)。采用了出勤奖励制度。三组的产前检查次数有显著差异(p小于0.001),高治疗组参与者的检查次数显著多于其他组。三组在分娩时的孕周存在差异(p小于0.006),高治疗组参与者的婴儿更具优势;然而,孕周差异中只有8%可归因于产前检查。高治疗组参与者产后回访的比例显著更高(与低治疗组参与者相比,p小于0.011;与对照对象相比,p小于0.002)。志愿者到医院探访并未提高产后回访率。无论治疗情况如何,大多数(99%)在产后回访时接受了避孕方法。三组在3个月时进行方法检查的回访率没有差异。然而,高治疗组参与者进行年度计划生育评估的回访比例显著更高(与低治疗组参与者相比,p小于0.015;与对照对象相比,p小于0.005)。高治疗组和低治疗组参与者在婴儿出生后第一年至少带婴儿进行一次健康检查方面与对照对象均有显著差异(两项测试的p均小于0.001)。(摘要截短至250字)