Suppr超能文献

评估子宫内膜癌的肌层浸润深度和整体分期:扩散加权成像与动态对比增强磁共振成像的比较。

Evaluation of depth of myometrial invasion and overall staging in endometrial cancer: comparison of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Radiology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Rd, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Radiology. 2012 Feb;262(2):530-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110984. Epub 2011 Nov 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with that of dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) MR imaging in evaluating the depth of myometrial invasion and overall stage in patients with endometrial cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board approved this retrospective study; patient consent was not required. From May 2008 to February 2010, 48 women with endometrial cancer underwent preoperative MR imaging, including T1- and T2-weighted imaging, DW MR imaging (b=0 and 800 sec/mm2) and DCE MR imaging. Two radiologists independently interpreted the depth of myometrial invasion, overall stage, and presence of pitfalls associated with inaccurate assessment of myometrial invasion at T1- and T2-weighted imaging, DW MR imaging, and DCE MR imaging. Myometrial invasion and overall stage were compared by using the McNemar test, and κ statistics were used for reader agreement.

RESULTS

For assessing the depth of myometrial invasion, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, respectively, were as follows: DW MR imaging-reader 1, 90%, 84%, and 100%; reader 2, 85%, 84%, and 88%; DCE MR imaging-reader 1, 71%, 61%, and 88%; reader 2, 79%, 77%, and 82%. The improvement in diagnostic accuracy for reader 1 was significant (P=.035). For myometrial invasion, κ values were 0.75 with DW MR imaging and 0.26 with DCE MR imaging. There was no association between inaccurate assessment of myometrial invasion and standard pitfalls with DW MR imaging. Readers 1 and 2 correctly staged more patients by using DW MR imaging (39 and 38 patients, respectively) than by using DCE MR imaging (29 and 30 patients, respectively) (P<.05). For overall stage, κ values were 0.74 with DW MR imaging and 0.22 with DCE MR imaging.

CONCLUSION

DW MR imaging has superior diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of myometrial invasion and significantly higher staging accuracy compared with DCE MR imaging.

摘要

目的

比较扩散加权(DW)磁共振成像(MR)与动态对比增强(DCE)MR 成像在评估子宫内膜癌患者肌层浸润深度和整体分期方面的诊断性能。

材料与方法

本研究经机构审查委员会批准,患者无需同意。2008 年 5 月至 2010 年 2 月,对 48 例子宫内膜癌患者行术前 MR 成像,包括 T1 加权和 T2 加权成像、DW MR 成像(b 值分别为 0 和 800 sec/mm2)和 DCE MR 成像。两位放射科医生分别独立评估 T1 加权和 T2 加权成像、DW MR 成像和 DCE MR 成像时肌层浸润深度、整体分期以及与肌层浸润深度评估不准确相关的陷阱。采用 McNemar 检验比较肌层浸润深度和整体分期,采用κ 统计量评估读者间的一致性。

结果

在评估肌层浸润深度方面,DW MR 成像-读者 1 的诊断准确性、敏感度和特异度分别为 90%、84%和 100%;读者 2 分别为 85%、84%和 88%;DCE MR 成像-读者 1 分别为 71%、61%和 88%;读者 2 分别为 79%、77%和 82%。读者 1 的诊断准确性显著提高(P=.035)。对于肌层浸润,DW MR 成像的κ 值为 0.75,DCE MR 成像的κ 值为 0.26。DW MR 成像与标准陷阱之间不存在肌层浸润评估不准确的关联。读者 1 和 2 分别通过 DW MR 成像(分别为 39 例和 38 例)正确分期的患者多于 DCE MR 成像(分别为 29 例和 30 例)(P<.05)。对于整体分期,DW MR 成像的κ 值为 0.74,DCE MR 成像的κ 值为 0.22。

结论

与 DCE MR 成像相比,DW MR 成像在评估肌层浸润方面具有更高的诊断准确性,并且分期准确性显著提高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验