Suppr超能文献

曲唑酮与阿米替林处方模式的药物利用审查。

A drug utilization review of prescribing patterns for trazodone versus amitriptyline.

作者信息

Bryant S G, Hokanson J A, Brown C S

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77550.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 1990 Sep;51 Suppl:27-9.

PMID:2211562
Abstract

The second-generation antidepressant trazodone has been thought by some clinicians to exert a less robust antidepressant effect than do tricyclic agents. This impression differs from the findings of numerous published clinical trials. In an effort to determine whether this discrepancy may be due to possible inappropriate dosing or use of trazodone for different patient subtypes, a retrospective chart review of 138 depressed inpatients treated with amitriptyline and of 42 depressed inpatients treated with trazodone was performed to compare their respective prescribing patterns. While these two groups did not differ with regard to most demographic variables, results revealed that patient prescribed trazodone were older (trazodone, mean +/- SD age = 54.5 +/- 8.8 years versus amitriptyline, 43.2 +/- 12.9 years; p less than .001), more often had a recurrent depressive disorder (trazodone = 57.1%, amitriptyline = 39.1%, p less than .06), and more frequently had a history of unresponsiveness to other antidepressants (trazodone = 47.6%, amitriptyline = 11.6%; p less than .001). In addition, initially prescribed daily doses of trazodone were below the recommended starting dose of 150 mg/day (mean +/- SD starting dose = 113.7 +/- 42.1 mg/day), while starting daily doses for amitriptyline (mean +/- SD = 69.8 +/- 20.1 mg/day) were judged to be more adequate relative to the recommended daily dose of 75 mg/day. Final trazodone dosage (mean +/- SD final dose = 217.9 +/- 87.5 mg/day) could be judged to have been far short of optimal levels of 250 to 350 mg/day and of up to 600 mg/day for inpatients and 400 mg/day for outpatient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

一些临床医生认为,第二代抗抑郁药曲唑酮的抗抑郁作用不如三环类药物强。这一观点与众多已发表的临床试验结果不同。为了确定这种差异是否可能是由于曲唑酮的剂量不当或对不同患者亚型的使用不当所致,对138例接受阿米替林治疗的抑郁症住院患者和42例接受曲唑酮治疗的抑郁症住院患者进行了回顾性病历审查,以比较他们各自的处方模式。虽然这两组在大多数人口统计学变量方面没有差异,但结果显示,服用曲唑酮的患者年龄较大(曲唑酮组,平均±标准差年龄=54.5±8.8岁,阿米替林组为43.2±12.9岁;p<0.001),复发性抑郁症的发生率更高(曲唑酮组=57.1%,阿米替林组=39.1%,p<0.06),对其他抗抑郁药无反应的病史更常见(曲唑酮组=47.6%,阿米替林组=11.6%;p<0.001)。此外,最初开具的曲唑酮每日剂量低于推荐起始剂量150毫克/天(平均±标准差起始剂量=113.7±42.1毫克/天),而阿米替林的起始每日剂量(平均±标准差=69.8±20.1毫克/天)相对于推荐每日剂量75毫克/天被认为更合适。曲唑酮的最终剂量(平均±标准差最终剂量=217.9±87.5毫克/天)远低于住院患者250至350毫克/天、最高600毫克/天以及门诊患者400毫克/天的最佳水平。(摘要截取自250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验