Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Aachen, RWTH Aachen University, D-52057 Aachen, Germany.
Resuscitation. 2012 May;83(5):626-32. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.10.029. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
Teleconsultation from the scene of an emergency to an experienced physician including real-time transmission of monitoring, audio and visual information seems to be feasible. In preparation for bringing such a system into practice within the research project "Med-on-@ix", a simulation study has been conducted to investigate whether telemedical assistance (TMA) in Emergency Medical Services (EMS) has an impact on compatibility to guidelines and timing.
In a controlled simulation study 29 EMS teams (one EMS physician, two paramedics) ran through standardized scenarios (STEMI: ST-elevation myocardial infarction; MT: major trauma) on high-fidelity patient simulators with defined complications (treatable clearly following guidelines). Team assignments were randomized and each team had to complete one scenario with and another without TMA. Analysis was based on videotaped scenarios using pre-defined scoring items and measured time intervals for each scenario.
Adherence to treatment algorithms improved using TMA. STEMI: cathlab informed (9/14 vs. 15/15; p=0.0169); allergies checked prior to acetylsalicylic acid (5/14 vs. 13/15; p=0.0078); analgosedation prior to cardioversion (10/14 vs. 15/15; p=0.0421); synchronized shock (6/14 vs. 14/15; p=0.0052). MT: adequate medication for intubation (3/15 vs. 10/14; p=0.0092); mean time to inform trauma centre 547 vs. 189 s (p=0.0001). No significant impairment of performance was detected in TMA groups.
In simulated setting TMA was able to improve treatment and safety without decline in timing. Nevertheless, further research is necessary to optimize the system for medical, organizational and technical reasons prior to the evaluation of this system in routine EMS.
从急救现场向有经验的医生进行远程咨询,包括实时传输监测、音频和视频信息,似乎是可行的。为了在研究项目“Med-on-@ix”中引入这样的系统,进行了一项模拟研究,以调查紧急医疗服务(EMS)中的远程医疗协助(TMA)是否对指南和时间产生影响。
在一项对照模拟研究中,29 个 EMS 团队(一名 EMS 医生,两名护理人员)在高保真患者模拟器上通过标准化场景(STEMI:ST 段抬高型心肌梗死;MT:重大创伤),并伴有明确的并发症(根据指南进行治疗)。团队分配是随机的,每个团队都必须在有和没有 TMA 的情况下完成一个场景。分析基于录像场景,使用预先定义的评分项目和每个场景的测量时间间隔。
使用 TMA 提高了治疗算法的依从性。STEMI:心导管室通知(9/14 对 15/15;p=0.0169);在使用乙酰水杨酸之前检查过敏史(5/14 对 13/15;p=0.0078);在电复律前进行镇痛镇静(10/14 对 15/15;p=0.0421);同步电击(6/14 对 14/15;p=0.0052)。MT:插管时给予适当的药物(3/15 对 10/14;p=0.0092);通知创伤中心的平均时间为 547 对 189 秒(p=0.0001)。在 TMA 组中未发现性能显著下降。
在模拟环境中,TMA 能够在不影响时间的情况下提高治疗和安全性。然而,为了医疗、组织和技术原因,在对常规 EMS 中的该系统进行评估之前,需要进一步研究以优化该系统。