Devine Dana V, Serrano Katherine
Canadian Blood Services, Research & Development, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Biologicals. 2012 May;40(3):187-90. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Nov 26.
There are a number of possible methods for the preparation of blood components. These vary with respect to risks and benefits to the blood system operation, to the donor and to the recipient. An understanding of these risks is necessary when deciding what component production strategies to pursue. This manuscript reviews the elements that should be considered when choosing which components to produce. The two broad schemas for component production are apheresis and the production of components from whole blood donations. The development of apheresis technologies brought significant benefits to the patient including improving the access to specialty products such as HLA-matched platelets. Benefits to blood centers include the collection of multiple transfusion doses from a single collection procedure. The challenges include the cost of the technology and a small increased risk to donors. Whole blood component preparation offers two main forms of technology: platelet rich plasma, and buffy coat, both of which are driven by platelet production. The two have different risk profiles, with overall benefits being more favorable to buffy coat production methods particularly with respect to improved process control. Issues such as donor variability affect all production methods and require further research.
制备血液成分有多种可能的方法。这些方法在对血液系统运行、献血者和受血者的风险和益处方面各不相同。在决定采用何种成分生产策略时,了解这些风险是必要的。本手稿回顾了选择生产哪些成分时应考虑的因素。成分生产的两种主要模式是单采和从全血捐献中生产成分。单采技术的发展给患者带来了显著益处,包括增加了获得特殊产品(如人类白细胞抗原匹配的血小板)的机会。对血液中心的益处包括通过单次采集程序收集多个输血剂量。挑战包括该技术的成本以及给献血者带来的轻微风险增加。全血成分制备提供两种主要技术形式:富血小板血浆和 Buffy 层,两者均由血小板生产驱动。这两种方法具有不同的风险特征,总体而言,益处更倾向于 Buffy 层生产方法,尤其是在改进过程控制方面。诸如献血者变异性等问题会影响所有生产方法,需要进一步研究。