• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结核性淋巴结炎的研究:各种实验室诊断方法的比较,特别提及结核聚合酶链反应

A study of tubercular lymphadenitis: a comparison of various laboratory diagnostic modalities with a special reference to tubercular polymerase chain reaction.

作者信息

Patwardhan S A, Bhargava P, Bhide V M, Kelkar D S

机构信息

Consultant Microbiologist, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre, Erandawane, Pune, India.

出版信息

Indian J Med Microbiol. 2011 Oct-Dec;29(4):389-94. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.90173.

DOI:10.4103/0255-0857.90173
PMID:22120800
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to compare various laboratory diagnostic methods, namely histopathological examination, Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) stain, AFB culture by conventional Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) method and fluorescence-based mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) technique and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in clinically suspected cases of tubercular lymphadenitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 65 lymph nodes biopsied from patients clinically suspected of having tubercular lymph nodes were included. Specimens were processed for AFB culture after NaOH-NALC concentration and inoculation on LJ medium and using the MGIT system. PCR was performed on all specimens using a commercial nested PCR kit targeting IS6110 insertion element of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. All lymph node specimens were subjected to histopathological examination.

RESULTS

Of the 65 lymph nodes, 37 (56.9%) were positive on MGIT culture and 45 (69.2%) were positive by PCR. Histopathology showed maximum sensitivity (96%) but with compromised specificity (78.5%). PCR showed 90.1% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The mean turnaround time for mycobacterial growth in smear negative specimens was 30 days determined by LJ and 20 days by MGIT techniques.

CONCLUSION

PCR is a rapid and useful method for diagnosis of TB lymphadenitis and definitely increases the positive predictive value of a positive histopathology report. MGIT is better than LJ culture as regards time to positivity and higher yield.

摘要

目的

我们研究的目的是比较各种实验室诊断方法,即组织病理学检查、萋-尼(ZN)染色、传统罗氏(LJ)培养基培养法进行抗酸杆菌(AFB)培养、基于荧光的分枝杆菌生长指示管(MGIT)技术以及聚合酶链反应(PCR),用于临床疑似结核性淋巴结炎的病例。

材料与方法

纳入了总共65例从临床疑似结核性淋巴结的患者身上获取的淋巴结活检样本。样本经氢氧化钠- N-乙酰-L-半胱氨酸(NaOH-NALC)浓缩后进行AFB培养,并接种于LJ培养基及使用MGIT系统。使用针对结核分枝杆菌复合群IS6110插入元件的商业巢式PCR试剂盒对所有样本进行PCR检测。所有淋巴结样本均进行组织病理学检查。

结果

在65个淋巴结中,37个(56.9%)在MGIT培养中呈阳性,45个(69.2%)通过PCR呈阳性。组织病理学显示出最高的敏感性(96%),但特异性有所降低(78.5%)。PCR显示敏感性为90.1%,特异性为100%。涂片阴性样本中分枝杆菌生长的平均周转时间,LJ法测定为30天,MGIT技术测定为20天。

结论

PCR是诊断结核性淋巴结炎的一种快速且有用的方法,确实提高了阳性组织病理学报告的阳性预测值。就阳性所需时间和更高的检出率而言,MGIT优于LJ培养法。

相似文献

1
A study of tubercular lymphadenitis: a comparison of various laboratory diagnostic modalities with a special reference to tubercular polymerase chain reaction.结核性淋巴结炎的研究:各种实验室诊断方法的比较,特别提及结核聚合酶链反应
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2011 Oct-Dec;29(4):389-94. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.90173.
2
Efficacy of an in-house polymerase chain reaction assay for rapid diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in patients with tubercular lymphadenitis: comparison with fine needle aspiration cytology and conventional techniques.一种用于快速诊断结核性淋巴结炎患者结核分枝杆菌的内部聚合酶链反应检测方法的效能:与细针穿刺细胞学检查及传统技术的比较
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2010 Oct-Dec;53(4):714-7. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.72049.
3
Multiplex polymerase chain reaction using insertion sequence 6110 (IS6110) and mycobacterial protein fraction from BCG of Rm 0.64 in electrophoresis target genes for diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis.使用插入序列6110(IS6110)和电泳中Rm 0.64的卡介苗分枝杆菌蛋白组分进行多重聚合酶链反应,用于诊断结核性淋巴结炎的靶基因。
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2013 Jan-Mar;31(1):24-8. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.108714.
4
The manual MGIT system for the detection of M. tuberculosis in respiratory specimens: an experience in the University Malaya Medical Centre.用于检测呼吸道标本中结核分枝杆菌的手动MGIT系统:马来亚大学医学中心的经验
Malays J Pathol. 2009 Dec;31(2):93-7.
5
Diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis in an area of HIV infection and limited diagnostic facilities.在艾滋病病毒感染地区且诊断设施有限的情况下对结核性淋巴结炎进行诊断。
Trop Geogr Med. 1994;46(5):288-92.
6
[Investigation of the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the lymph node aspirates of the suspected tularemia lymphadenitis cases].[对疑似兔热病淋巴结炎病例的淋巴结抽吸物中结核分枝杆菌存在情况的调查]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2014 Jan;48(1):129-34.
7
Evaluation of real-time polymerase chain reaction for detection of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the diagnosis of cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis in a country with a high tuberculosis incidence.评价实时聚合酶链反应检测结核分枝杆菌 16S 核糖体 RNA 基因在高结核发病率国家诊断宫颈结核性淋巴结炎的价值。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Aug;55(3):313-21. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis401. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
8
Simultaneous use of two PCR systems targeting IS6110 and MPB64 for confirmation of diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis.同时使用针对IS6110和MPB64的两种聚合酶链反应(PCR)系统来确诊结核性淋巴结炎。
J Commun Dis. 2006 Mar;38(3):274-9.
9
Polymerase chain reaction detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from fine-needle aspirate for the diagnosis of cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis.聚合酶链反应检测细针穿刺抽吸物中的结核分枝杆菌用于诊断颈部结核性淋巴结炎。
Laryngoscope. 2000 Jan;110(1):30-4. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200001000-00006.
10
Comparative evaluation of fine needle aspiration cytology, culture, and PCR in diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis.细针穿刺细胞学检查、培养及聚合酶链反应在结核性淋巴结炎诊断中的对比评估
Diagn Cytopathol. 2011 Nov;39(11):822-6. doi: 10.1002/dc.21472. Epub 2010 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of nested multiplex PCR assay targeting MTP40 and IS6110 gene sequences for the diagnosis of tubercular lymphadenitis.靶向MTP40和IS6110基因序列的巢式多重PCR检测法在结核性淋巴结炎诊断中的应用
J Microbiol. 2017 Jan;55(1):63-67. doi: 10.1007/s12275-017-6127-y. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
2
Endoscopic ultrasound characteristics of tubercular lymphadenopathy in comparison to reactive lymph nodes.结核性淋巴结病与反应性淋巴结相比的内镜超声特征
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;35(1):55-9. doi: 10.1007/s12664-016-0627-2. Epub 2016 Feb 29.