Validation study of asthma screening criteria based on subjective symptoms and fractional exhaled nitric oxide.

BACKGROUND

In the latest Global Initiative for Asthma guideline, neither sputum eosinophilia nor fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) have been evaluated prospectively as an aid in asthma diagnosis, but these measurements are being evaluated for potential use in determining optimal treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To report criteria for screening asthma using subjective symptoms and FeNO levels and results of a prospective validation study using these criteria.

METHODS

Sixty-one outpatients with recurrent cough, wheezing, or dyspnea underwent measurements of FeNO levels, pulmonary function, methacholine airway responsiveness, and inflammatory cells in induced sputum. The sensitivity, specificity, and concordance achieved using the FeNO-based criteria (at least 1 of the following subjective symptoms: recurrent cough, wheezing, or dyspnea and/or FeNO level ≥ 40 ppb) were analyzed and compared with the values obtained using conventional asthma diagnostic criteria, which includes subjective symptoms with any 2 of the following conditions: airway hyperresponsiveness, reversible airflow limitation, and eosinophilia in induced sputum.

RESULTS

Of the 61 patients, 41 were diagnosed as having asthma by the conventional criteria, and 33 were diagnosed as having asthma by the FeNO-based criteria, which showed a sensitivity of 78.6%, a specificity of 89.5%, and a concordance rate of 0.62. Nine of 42 patients were misdiagnosed as not having asthma by FeNO-based criteria (mean [SD] FeNO level, 23.9 [8.0] ppb). Seven of 9 patients were diagnosed as having nonatopic asthma according to IgE levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Asthma may be accurately diagnosed in daily practice on the basis of subjective symptoms and FeNO levels, particularly in atopic patients.