Department of Medicine I, Endocrine and Diabetes Unit, University of Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Horm Cancer. 2011 Dec;2(6):348-53. doi: 10.1007/s12672-011-0093-3.
Due to broader use of conventional imaging techniques, adrenal tumors are detected with increasing frequency comprising a wide variety of different tumor entities. Despite improved conventional imaging techniques, a significant number of adrenal lesions remain that cannot be easily determined. A particular diagnostic challenge are lesions in patients with known extra-adrenal malignancy because these patients frequently harbor adrenal metastases. Furthermore, adrenal masses with low fat content and no detectable hormone excess are difficult to diagnose properly. Fine needle biopsy is invasive, often unsuccessful, and puts patients at risk, e. g., in cases of pheochromocytoma or adrenal cancer. Noninvasive characterization using radiotracers has therefore been established in recent years. (18)F-FDG PET helps to differentiate benign from malignant lesions. However, it does not distinguish between adrenocortical or nonadrenocortical lesions (e.g., metastases or adrenocortical carcinoma). More recently, enzyme inhibitors have been developed as tracers for adrenal imaging. Metomidate is most widely used. It binds with high specificity and affinity to CYP11B enzymes of the adrenal cortex. As these enzymes are exclusively expressed in adrenocortical cells, uptake of labeled metomidate tracers has been shown to be highly specific for adrenocortical neoplasia. (11)C-metomidate PET and (123)I-iodometomidate SPECT imaging has been introduced into clinical use. Both tracers not only distinguish between adrenocortical and nonadrenocortical lesions but are also able to visualize metastases of adrenocortical carcinoma. The very specific uptake has recently led to first application of (131)I-iodometomidate for radiotherapy in ACC. In conclusion, metomidate-based imaging is an important complementary tool to diagnose adrenal lesions that cannot be determined by other methods.
由于常规影像学技术的广泛应用,越来越多地发现各种不同类型的肿瘤实体的肾上腺肿瘤。尽管常规影像学技术有所改进,但仍有相当数量的肾上腺病变难以确定。对于已知有肾上腺外恶性肿瘤的患者,诊断具有特别的挑战性,因为这些患者经常有肾上腺转移。此外,脂肪含量低且没有检测到激素过多的肾上腺肿块难以正确诊断。细针活检具有侵袭性,往往不成功,并使患者面临风险,例如嗜铬细胞瘤或肾上腺癌的患者。因此,近年来已建立了使用放射性示踪剂进行非侵入性特征描述。(18)F-FDG PET 有助于区分良性和恶性病变。但是,它不能区分肾上腺皮质或非肾上腺皮质病变(例如转移或肾上腺皮质癌)。最近,已经开发出酶抑制剂作为肾上腺成像的示踪剂。甲米妥是最广泛使用的。它与肾上腺皮质的 CYP11B 酶具有高度特异性和亲和力结合。由于这些酶仅在肾上腺皮质细胞中表达,因此已证明标记的甲米妥示踪剂摄取对肾上腺皮质肿瘤具有高度特异性。(11)C-甲米妥 PET 和(123)I-碘甲米妥 SPECT 成像已被引入临床应用。这两种示踪剂不仅可以区分肾上腺皮质和非肾上腺皮质病变,而且还能够可视化肾上腺皮质癌的转移。最近,非常特异性的摄取导致了首次将(131)I-碘甲米妥用于 ACC 的放射治疗。总之,基于甲米妥的成像对于诊断其他方法无法确定的肾上腺病变是一种重要的补充工具。