• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

夜间和白天初始牙菌斑积聚的差异。

Difference in initial dental biofilm accumulation between night and day.

机构信息

Department of Dental Pathology, Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Aarhus Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Odontol Scand. 2012 Dec;70(6):441-7. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.634833. Epub 2011 Nov 30.

DOI:10.3109/00016357.2011.634833
PMID:22126594
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study of initial microbial colonization on dental surfaces is a field of intensive research because of the aetiological role of biofilms in oral diseases. Most previous studies of de novo accumulation and composition of dental biofilms in vivo do not differentiate between biofilms formed during day and night. This study hypothesized that there is a diurnal variation in the rate of accumulation of bacteria on solid surfaces in the oral cavity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In situ biofilm from healthy individuals was collected for 12 h during day and night, respectively, subjected to fluorescent in situ hybridization and visualized using confocal laser scanning microscopy.

RESULTS

Analysis of the biofilms using stereological methods and digital image analysis revealed a consistent statistically significant difference between both the total number of bacteria and the biovolume in the two 12-h groups (p = 0.012), with the highest accumulation of bacteria during daytime (a factor of 8.8 and 6.1 higher, respectively). Hybridization with probes specific for streptococci and Actinomyces naeslundii indicated a higher proportion of streptococci in biofilms grown during daytime as compared to night-time. No differences could be observed for A. naeslundii. The degree of microbial coverage and the bacterial composition varied considerably between different individuals.

CONCLUSION

The data provide firm evidence that initial biofilm formation decreases during the night, which may reflect differences in the availability of salivary nutrients. This finding is of significant importance when studying population dynamics during experimental dental biofilm formation.

摘要

目的

由于生物膜在口腔疾病中的病因作用,研究牙面初始微生物定植是一个密集研究领域。大多数先前关于体内新生牙菌斑的积累和组成的研究并没有区分白天和夜间形成的生物膜。本研究假设口腔固体表面细菌的积累速度存在昼夜变化。

材料和方法

分别在白天和夜间收集健康个体的原位生物膜 12 小时,进行荧光原位杂交并用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜观察。

结果

使用体视学法和数字图像分析对生物膜进行分析,结果显示两组 12 小时生物膜的总细菌数量和生物体积均存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.012),白天的细菌积累最高(分别高 8.8 和 6.1 倍)。用特异性探针杂交链球菌和内氏放线菌,表明与夜间相比,白天生长的生物膜中链球菌的比例更高。对于内氏放线菌,没有观察到差异。不同个体之间的微生物覆盖率和细菌组成差异很大。

结论

该数据提供了确凿的证据,表明初始生物膜形成在夜间减少,这可能反映了唾液营养物质可用性的差异。在研究实验性牙菌斑形成过程中的群体动态时,这一发现具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Difference in initial dental biofilm accumulation between night and day.夜间和白天初始牙菌斑积聚的差异。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2012 Dec;70(6):441-7. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.634833. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
2
Application of stereological principles for quantification of bacteria in intact dental biofilms.体视学原理在完整牙菌斑中细菌定量分析中的应用。
Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2009 Feb;24(1):69-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2008.00482.x.
3
In situ identification of streptococci and other bacteria in initial dental biofilm by confocal laser scanning microscopy and fluorescence in situ hybridization.通过共聚焦激光扫描显微镜和荧光原位杂交技术对初始牙菌斑中的链球菌及其他细菌进行原位鉴定。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2007 Dec;115(6):459-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2007.00494.x.
4
Actinomyces naeslundii in initial dental biofilm formation.内氏放线菌在早期牙菌斑形成中的作用
Microbiology (Reading). 2009 Jul;155(Pt 7):2116-2126. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.027706-0. Epub 2009 Apr 30.
5
Development of a multispecies biofilm community by four root canal bacteria.四种根管细菌构建多物种生物膜群落。
J Endod. 2012 Mar;38(3):318-23. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.008. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
6
The in vivo dynamics of Streptococcus spp., Actinomyces naeslundii, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Veillonella spp. in dental plaque biofilm as analysed by five-colour multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization.通过五色多重荧光原位杂交分析牙菌斑生物膜中链球菌属、内氏放线菌、具核梭杆菌和韦荣氏菌属的体内动态。
J Med Microbiol. 2007 May;56(Pt 5):681-687. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47094-0.
7
Individual vitality pattern of in situ dental biofilms at different locations in the oral cavity.口腔内不同位置原位牙菌斑的个体活力模式。
Caries Res. 2004 Sep-Oct;38(5):442-7. doi: 10.1159/000079625.
8
Microbial communities and their interactions in biofilm systems: an overview.生物膜系统中的微生物群落及其相互作用:综述
Water Sci Technol. 2004;49(11-12):327-36.
9
In vivo study of the initial bacterial adhesion on different implant materials.体内研究不同种植材料初始细菌黏附。
Arch Oral Biol. 2013 Sep;58(9):1139-47. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 May 18.
10
Substrata effects on bacterial biofilm development in a subsurface flow dairy waste treatment wetland.潜流奶牛废水处理湿地中基质对细菌生物膜形成的影响
Water Sci Technol. 2003;48(8):261-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of antimicrobial activity and oxidative damage induced by laser ablation with indocyanine green versus aPDT with methylene blue and curcumin on E. coli biofilm in root canals.吲哚菁绿激光消融与亚甲蓝和姜黄素光动力疗法对根管内大肠杆菌生物膜抗菌活性及氧化损伤的对比分析
Odontology. 2025 Apr 22. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01103-7.
2
Characterization and morphological methods for oral biofilm visualization: where are we nowadays?口腔生物膜可视化的表征与形态学方法:我们如今处于什么阶段?
AIMS Microbiol. 2024 Jun 6;10(2):391-414. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024020. eCollection 2024.
3
Salivary Biomarkers for Dental Caries Detection and Personalized Monitoring.
用于龋齿检测和个性化监测的唾液生物标志物
J Pers Med. 2021 Mar 23;11(3):235. doi: 10.3390/jpm11030235.
4
Microbial Analysis of Saliva to Identify Oral Diseases Using a Point-of-Care Compatible qPCR Assay.使用即时检测兼容的定量聚合酶链反应检测法对唾液进行微生物分析以识别口腔疾病
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 11;9(9):2945. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092945.
5
Monitoring of extracellular pH in young dental biofilms grown in vivo in the presence and absence of sucrose.监测体内生长的年轻牙菌斑生物膜在有/无糖存在时的细胞外 pH 值。
J Oral Microbiol. 2016 Feb 15;8:30390. doi: 10.3402/jom.v8.30390. eCollection 2016.