Suppr超能文献

无菌动物对休克的反应。

Response of germfree animals to shock.

作者信息

Heneghan J B

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Louisiana University School of Medicine, New Orleans 70112.

出版信息

J Med. 1990;21(1-2):51-66.

PMID:2212868
Abstract

Many current models of septic shock in conventional (CV) rats utilize cecal ligation and perforation. That germfree (GF) status offered no increased protection in shock, compared with the effect on CV controls, was shown in early studies. Appropriate fluid therapy, however, did increase survival. Our laboratory's efforts to determine the influence of the GF rat's enlarged cecum on its early response to hemorrhagic shock can be summarized as follows. Ten litters of 8 GF rats each were randomly divided into four groups with two animals/group: CV control, GF control, CV cecectomized and GF cecectomized. Littermates were cecectomized at seven weeks and bled at 14 weeks. Under methoxyflurane anesthesia, the rats were cannulated (femoral artery), heparinized, restrained, and allowed to awaken. Blood pressure was maintained at 60 mmHg for 1 hr and at 50 mmHg for 3 hr by adjusting the height of a burette reservoir. In the GF cecectomized rats, 95% (19/20) survived, whereas only 50% (10/20) of the other three categories survived. Cecectomized GF rats required only 3% of their shed blood, whereas, the other three groups needed 10 to 15%. Cecum from the GF rat contains a 5-fold greater quantity of bioactive and vasoactive substances than the cecum of its CV control, and may cause these changes in basic cardiovascular parameters in GF control rats: decreased cardiac output, blood volume, heart weight, and vasoconstriction to epinephrine in mesenteric arterioles, plus increased hemoconcentration and blood viscosity. In cecectomised GF rats, these parameters return to the CV levels and help to protect the animal during the early hypovolemic trauma. Clearly, the rat's cecum produces significant cardiovascular effects that need to be considered when evaluating experimental models for trauma or stress.

摘要

许多传统(CV)大鼠的脓毒症休克模型采用盲肠结扎和穿孔术。早期研究表明,与对CV对照组的影响相比,无菌(GF)状态并未在休克中提供更高的保护。然而,适当的液体疗法确实提高了存活率。我们实验室确定GF大鼠扩大的盲肠对其早期失血性休克反应影响的工作可总结如下。将10窝每窝8只GF大鼠随机分为四组,每组两只动物:CV对照组、GF对照组、CV切除盲肠组和GF切除盲肠组。同窝幼仔在7周时进行盲肠切除,并在14周时放血。在甲氧氟烷麻醉下,将大鼠插管(股动脉)、肝素化、固定并使其苏醒。通过调整滴管储液器的高度,将血压维持在60 mmHg 1小时,然后维持在50 mmHg 3小时。在GF切除盲肠的大鼠中,95%(19/20)存活,而其他三类中只有50%(10/20)存活。切除盲肠的GF大鼠仅需补充其失血量的3%,而其他三组需要10%至15%。GF大鼠的盲肠所含生物活性和血管活性物质的量比其CV对照大鼠的盲肠多5倍,并且可能导致GF对照大鼠的这些基本心血管参数发生变化:心输出量、血容量、心脏重量降低,肠系膜小动脉对肾上腺素的血管收缩反应增强,同时血液浓缩和血液粘度增加。在切除盲肠的GF大鼠中,这些参数恢复到CV水平,并有助于在早期低血容量创伤期间保护动物。显然,大鼠的盲肠会产生显著的心血管影响,在评估创伤或应激的实验模型时需要考虑这一点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验