Suppr超能文献

急诊医疗服务中的患者安全:文献系统评价。

Patient safety in emergency medical services: a systematic review of the literature.

机构信息

Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012 Jan-Mar;16(1):20-35. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.621045.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preventable harm from medical care has been extensively documented in the inpatient setting. Emergency medical services (EMS) providers care for patients in dynamic and challenging environments; prehospital emergency care is a field that represents an area of high risk for errors and harm, but has received relatively little attention in the patient safety literature.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the threats to patient safety unique to the EMS environment and interventions that mitigate those threats, we completed a systematic review of the literature.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) for combinations of key EMS and patient safety terms composed by a pan-canadian expert panel using a year limit of 1999 to 2011. We excluded commentaries, opinions, letters, abstracts, and non-english publications. Two investigators performed an independent hierarchical screening of titles, abstracts, and full-text articles blinded to source. We used the kappa statistic to examine interrater agreement. Any differences were resolved by consensus.

RESULTS

We retrieved 5,959 titles, and 88 publications met the inclusion criteria and were categorized into seven themes: adverse events and medication errors (22 articles), clinical judgment (13), communication (6), ground vehicle safety (9), aircraft safety (6), interfacility transport (16), and intubation (16). Two articles were randomized controlled trials; the remainder were systematic reviews, prospective observational studies, retrospective database/chart reviews, qualitative interviews, or surveys. The kappa statistics for titles, abstracts, and full-text articles were 0.65, 0.79, and 0.87, respectively, for the first search and 0.60, 0.74, and 0.85 for the second.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a paucity of scientific literature exploring patient safety in EMS. Research is needed to improve our understanding of problem magnitude and threats to patient safety and to guide interventions.

摘要

背景

医疗保健中的可预防伤害已在住院环境中得到广泛记录。急诊医疗服务(EMS)提供者在动态和具有挑战性的环境中照顾患者;院前急救是一个代表高风险的领域,容易发生错误和伤害,但在患者安全文献中受到的关注相对较少。

目的

为了确定 EMS 环境中特有的患者安全威胁,并确定减轻这些威胁的干预措施,我们对文献进行了系统回顾。

方法

我们使用加拿大专家小组组成的关键 EMS 和患者安全术语组合,在 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature(CINAHL)中进行了搜索,使用的年限限制为 1999 年至 2011 年。我们排除了评论、意见、信件、摘要和非英语出版物。两名调查员对标题、摘要和全文文章进行了独立的分层筛选,对来源进行了盲法处理。我们使用 Kappa 统计量检查了评分者间的一致性。任何差异都通过共识解决。

结果

我们检索到 5959 个标题,有 88 篇符合纳入标准,并分为七个主题:不良事件和用药错误(22 篇文章)、临床判断(13 篇)、沟通(6 篇)、地面车辆安全(9 篇)、飞机安全(6 篇)、机构间转运(16 篇)和插管(16 篇)。两篇文章为随机对照试验;其余的是系统评价、前瞻性观察研究、回顾性数据库/图表回顾、定性访谈或调查。第一次搜索的标题、摘要和全文文章的 Kappa 统计量分别为 0.65、0.79 和 0.87,第二次搜索分别为 0.60、0.74 和 0.85。

结论

我们发现探索 EMS 患者安全的科学文献很少。需要进行研究以提高我们对问题严重程度和患者安全威胁的理解,并指导干预措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验