Suppr超能文献

《牙体非龋性缺损的修复:基于牙体牙髓病临床诊疗病例的研究网络》。

Restoration of noncarious tooth defects by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

机构信息

Division of Operative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Dec;142(12):1368-75. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0138.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The authors conducted a study to quantify the reasons for restoring noncarious tooth defects (NCTDs) by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN) and to assess the tooth, patient and dentist characteristics associated with those reasons.

METHODS

Data were collected by 178 DPBRN dentists regarding the placement of 1,301 consecutive restorations owing to NCTDs. Information gathered included the main clinical reason, other than dental caries, for restoration of previously unrestored permanent tooth surfaces; characteristics of patients who received treatment; dentists' and dental practices' characteristics; teeth and surfaces restored; and restorative materials used.

RESULTS

Dentists most often placed restorations to treat lesions caused by abrasion, abfraction or erosion (AAE) (46 percent) and tooth fracture (31 percent). Patients 41 years or older received restorations mainly because of AAE (P < .001). Premolars and anterior teeth were restored mostly owing to AAE; molars were restored mostly owing to tooth fracture (P < .001). Dentists used directly placed resin-based composite (RBC) largely to restore AAE lesions and fractured teeth (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among DPBRN practices, AAE and tooth fracture were the main reasons for restoring noncarious tooth surfaces. Pre-molars and anterior teeth of patients 41 years and older are most likely to receive restorations owing to AAE; molars are most likely to receive restorations owing to tooth fracture. Dentists restored both types of NCTDs most often with RBC.

摘要

背景

作者开展了一项研究,以量化 The Dental Practice-Based Research Network(DPBRN)中牙医修复非龋性牙体缺损(NCTD)的原因,并评估与这些原因相关的牙齿、患者和牙医特征。

方法

178 名 DPBRN 牙医收集了 1301 例连续 NCTD 修复的情况,记录了主要的临床原因(除龋齿外)、未修复的永久牙面修复原因、接受治疗的患者特征、牙医和牙科实践特征、修复的牙齿和牙面以及使用的修复材料。

结果

牙医最常放置修复体以治疗磨损、微裂或侵蚀(AAE)(46%)和牙折(31%)引起的病变。41 岁及以上的患者因 AAE 接受修复治疗的比例最高(P<0.001)。前磨牙和前牙主要因 AAE 而被修复;磨牙主要因牙折而被修复(P<0.001)。牙医主要使用直接放置的树脂基复合材料(RBC)来修复 AAE 病变和折裂的牙齿(P<0.001)。

结论

在 DPBRN 实践中,AAE 和牙折是修复非龋性牙面的主要原因。41 岁及以上患者的前磨牙和前牙最有可能因 AAE 而接受修复治疗;磨牙最有可能因牙折而接受修复治疗。牙医最常使用 RBC 修复这两种类型的 NCTD。

相似文献

4
Cluster Effects in a National Dental PBRN restorative study.全国牙科 PBRN 修复研究中的聚集效应。
J Dent Res. 2013 Sep;92(9):782-7. doi: 10.1177/0022034513497752. Epub 2013 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

6
Progression of non-carious cervical lesions: 3D morphological analysis.非龋性颈领病变的进展:3D 形态学分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):575-583. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04036-x. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
9
Etiological Aspects of Noncarious Dental Lesions.非龋性牙体疾病的病因学方面
Curr Health Sci J. 2017 Jan-Mar;43(1):54-61. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.43.01.08. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
10
Abfraction lesions: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options.磨损性病变:病因、诊断及治疗选择
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2016 May 3;8:79-87. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S63465. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

6
The effects of occlusal loading on the margins of cervical restorations.咬合负荷对颈部修复体边缘的影响。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 Oct;140(10):1275-82. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0051.
8
Abfraction: separating fact from fiction.磨损:分清事实与虚构。
Aust Dent J. 2009 Mar;54(1):2-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.01080.x.
9
Non-carious cervical tooth surface loss: a literature review.非龋性颈部牙体硬组织缺损:文献综述
J Dent. 2008 Oct;36(10):759-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 25.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验