Boyko E J, Alderman B W
Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(9):851-8. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90068-z.
We discuss in this paper the extent to which disease risk factors may assist in the diagnostic process. We caution that disease risk factors need not be very sensitive or specific. Risk factor specificity and sensitivity may be further reduced if, in the former case, the risk factor is related to other illnesses having the same clinical presentation as the disease of interest, or if, in the latter case, the risk factor disappears with the onset of illness. We illustrate these points in a discussion of the utility of smoking as a diagnostic test for malignancy in two clinical situations, the patient with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria and the patient with a solitary pulmonary nodule. Risk factors hold great promise as aids to medical diagnosis, as this information is readily available to clinicians at little or no cost. Clinicians, however, should exercise caution when using risk factors of unproven diagnostic utility in medical diagnosis, as their presence may have little or no effect on disease probability.
我们在本文中讨论疾病风险因素在多大程度上可辅助诊断过程。我们提醒,疾病风险因素不一定非常敏感或特异。如果在前一种情况下,风险因素与具有和所关注疾病相同临床表现的其他疾病相关,或者在后一种情况下,风险因素随疾病发作而消失,那么风险因素的特异性和敏感性可能会进一步降低。我们在讨论吸烟作为两种临床情形(无症状镜下血尿患者和孤立性肺结节患者)中恶性肿瘤诊断试验的效用时阐述这些要点。风险因素作为医学诊断辅助手段具有很大潜力,因为临床医生几乎无需成本就能轻易获取此信息。然而,临床医生在医学诊断中使用未经证实具有诊断效用的风险因素时应谨慎,因为它们的存在可能对疾病概率影响很小或没有影响。