Suppr超能文献

两种针对宫颈癌活检组织中 L1 或 E6/E7 区的人乳头瘤病毒基因分型检测方法的比较。

Comparison between two human papillomavirus genotyping assays targeting the L1 or E6/E7 region in cervical cancer biopsies.

机构信息

Microbiology Service, Fundació Institut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain.

出版信息

Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2012 May;30(5):225-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2011.09.019. Epub 2011 Nov 30.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is increasingly used in cervical cancer prevention strategies, and a variety of HPV genotyping assays have been developed. We aimed to compare the performance of two HPV genotyping techniques in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens from a series of invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cases.

METHODS

Archival FFPE tissue blocks from 78 SCC cases were initially considered. DNA was extracted from dewaxed tissue sections and tested with the INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra assay (Innogenetics), and the F-HPV typing kit (Genomed) targeting the L1 and E6/E7 regions, respectively.

RESULTS

The INNO-LiPA assay showed a higher sensitivity (98.6%) than the F-HPV assay (78.6%). A total of 12 (17.1%) biopsies showed multiple-type infections evidenced by at least one assay. Among the SCC cases tested, HPV16 and/or 18 were detected in 70% of the cases, and 18.4% of them had multiple infections with other high-risk types.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the INNO-LiPA assay has a better performance than the F-HPV in FFPE specimens, probably due to its smaller amplicon size and the wider range of detectable HPV types. The prevalence of multiple infections could be higher than previously reported, as evidenced by the combination of the two assays.

摘要

简介

人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测越来越多地应用于宫颈癌预防策略中,并且已经开发出了多种 HPV 基因分型检测方法。我们旨在比较两种 HPV 基因分型技术在一系列浸润性鳞状细胞癌(SCC)病例的福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)组织标本中的性能。

方法

最初考虑了 78 例 SCC 病例的存档 FFPE 组织块。从去蜡组织切片中提取 DNA,分别使用 INNO-LiPA HPV 基因分型额外检测试剂盒(Innogenetics)和 F-HPV 基因分型试剂盒(Genomed)检测 L1 和 E6/E7 区域。

结果

INNO-LiPA 检测法的敏感性(98.6%)高于 F-HPV 检测法(78.6%)。共有 12 份(17.1%)活检显示至少有一种检测方法证实存在多种类型感染。在所检测的 SCC 病例中,HPV16 和/或 18 型在 70%的病例中被检测到,其中 18.4%的病例存在其他高危型别的多重感染。

结论

我们的结果表明,与 F-HPV 相比,INNO-LiPA 检测法在 FFPE 标本中的性能更好,这可能是由于其扩增子较小且可检测的 HPV 类型范围更广。多种感染的流行率可能比之前报道的更高,这两种检测方法的结合就证明了这一点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验