Molecular Microbiology Department, University Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Nov;50(11):3451-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01368-12. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
The purpose of this study was to develop a high-throughput method for the identification of pneumococcal capsular types. Multiplex PCR combined with fragment analysis and automated fluorescent capillary electrophoresis (FAF-mPCR) was utilized. FAF-mPCR was composed of only 3 PCRs for the specific detection of serotypes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6A/6B, 6C, 7F/7A, 7C/(7B/40), 8, 9V/9A, 9N/9L, 10A, 10F/(10C/33C), 11A/11D/11F, 12F/(12A/44/46), 13, 14, 15A/15F, 15B/15C, 16F, 17F, 18/(18A/18B/18C/18F), 19A, 19F, 20, 21, 22F/22A, 23A, 23B, 23F, 24/(24A/24B/24F), 31, 33F/(33A/37), 34, 35A/(35C/42), 35B, 35F/47F, 38/25F, and 39. In order to evaluate the assay, all invasive pneumococcal isolates (n = 394) characterized at Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain, from July 2010 to July 2011 were included in this study. The Wallace coefficient was used to evaluate the overall agreement between two typing methods (Quellung reaction versus FAF-mPCR). A high concordance with Quellung was found: 97.2% (383/394) of samples. The Wallace coefficient was 0.981 (range, 0.965 to 0.997). Only 11 results were discordant with the Quellung reaction. However, latex reaction and Quellung results of the second reference laboratory agreed with FAF-mPCR for 9 of these 11 strains (82%). Therefore, we considered that only 2 of 394 strains (0.5%) were not properly characterized by the new assay. The automation of the process allowed the typing of 30 isolates in a few hours with a lower cost than that of the Quellung reaction. These results indicate that FAF-mPCR is a good method to determine the capsular serotype of Streptococcus pneumoniae.
本研究的目的是开发一种高通量的方法来鉴定肺炎球菌荚膜型。我们采用了多重 PCR 结合片段分析和自动化荧光毛细管电泳(FAF-mPCR)。FAF-mPCR 仅由 3 个 PCR 组成,用于特异性检测血清型 1、2、3、4、5、6A/6B、6C、7F/7A、7C/(7B/40)、8、9V/9A、9N/9L、10A、10F/(10C/33C)、11A/11D/11F、12F/(12A/44/46)、13、14、15A/15F、15B/15C、16F、17F、18/(18A/18B/18C/18F)、19A、19F、20、21、22F/22A、23A、23B、23F、24/(24A/24B/24F)、31、33F/(33A/37)、34、35A/(35C/42)、35B、35F/47F、38/25F 和 39。为了评估该检测方法,我们纳入了 2010 年 7 月至 2011 年 7 月期间在西班牙巴塞罗那 Sant Joan de Déu 医院鉴定的所有侵袭性肺炎球菌分离株(n=394)进行研究。我们使用 Wallace 系数来评估两种分型方法(胶乳反应与 FAF-mPCR)之间的总一致性。我们发现与胶乳反应具有高度一致性:394 个样本中有 383 个(97.2%)。Wallace 系数为 0.981(范围为 0.965 至 0.997)。只有 11 个结果与胶乳反应不一致。然而,第二个参考实验室的乳胶反应和胶乳反应结果与 FAF-mPCR 一致,这 11 株中有 9 株(82%)。因此,我们认为只有 394 株中的 2 株(0.5%)未被新检测方法正确鉴定。该过程的自动化使得在数小时内可以对 30 个分离株进行分型,成本低于胶乳反应。这些结果表明 FAF-mPCR 是一种很好的方法,可以确定肺炎链球菌的荚膜血清型。