Suppr超能文献

特发性与起搏诱导的左束支传导阻滞的心室失同步及其对左心室收缩功能正常患者的预后影响。

Ventricular dyssynchrony of idiopathic versus pacing-induced left bundle branch block and its prognostic effect in patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Korea.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2012 Feb 15;109(4):556-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.09.048. Epub 2011 Nov 29.

Abstract

The extent of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony might not be comparable between right ventricular pacing-induced left bundle branch block (RV-LBBB) and idiopathic LBBB (iLBBB), despite the morphologic analogy on the electrocardiogram. The objectives of the present study were to elucidate the differences in the LV dyssynchrony index (LVdys) between RV-LBBB and iLBBB, and to assess the prognostic implication of LV dyssynchrony. The conventional echocardiographic parameters, LVdys, and LV end-systolic wall stress were evaluated in 20 healthy volunteers and 21 patients with iLBBB and 20 with RV-LBBB with preserved LV systolic function. Three types of LVdys were evaluated: LVdys-6, LVdys-2, and LVdys-standard deviation. The patients were clinically followed up for about 3 years. The prevalence of LV dyssynchrony was not rare in those with either iLBBB or RV-LBBB, but it was more prevalent in the patients with iLBBB than in those with RV-LBBB. The patients with iLBBB had greater LVdys than those with RV-LBBB (84 ± 55 vs 55 ± 50 for LVdys-6, 51 ± 49 vs 31 ± 40 for LVdys-2, 37 ± 24 vs 24 ± 22 for LVdys-standard deviation in iLBBB vs RV-LBBB). LVdys displayed significant correlations with QRS duration, LV volumes, LV ejection fraction, LV end-systolic wall stress, and mitral inflow E/mitral annular E' velocity ratio. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the LV end-diastolic volume and LV end-systolic wall stress were independent determinants of the presence of LV dyssynchrony. During follow-up, no cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure was reported in either group. In conclusion, despite similarities in electrocardiographic morphology, the extent of LV dyssynchrony were greater in patients with iLBBB, with LV preload and afterload the main determinants. No association was found between the presence of LV dyssynchrony and prognosis.

摘要

尽管心电图形态相似,但右心室起搏诱导的左束支传导阻滞(RV-LBBB)和特发性左束支传导阻滞(iLBBB)之间的左心室(LV)不同步程度可能无法进行比较。本研究的目的是阐明 RV-LBBB 和 iLBBB 之间 LV 不同步指数(LVdys)的差异,并评估 LV 不同步的预后意义。在 20 名健康志愿者和 21 名 iLBBB 患者以及 20 名 RV-LBBB 患者中评估了常规超声心动图参数、LVdys 和 LV 收缩末期壁应力。评估了三种类型的 LVdys:LVdys-6、LVdys-2 和 LVdys-标准差。对患者进行了约 3 年的临床随访。在 iLBBB 或 RV-LBBB 患者中,LV 不同步的发生率并不少见,但在 iLBBB 患者中比在 RV-LBBB 患者中更为常见。iLBBB 患者的 LVdys 大于 RV-LBBB 患者(LVdys-6 为 84 ± 55 对 55 ± 50,LVdys-2 为 51 ± 49 对 31 ± 40,LVdys-标准差为 37 ± 24 对 24 ± 22)。LVdys 与 QRS 持续时间、LV 容积、LV 射血分数、LV 收缩末期壁应力和二尖瓣流入 E/二尖瓣环 E'速度比呈显著相关。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,LV 舒张末期容积和 LV 收缩末期壁应力是 LV 不同步存在的独立决定因素。在随访期间,两组均未报告心血管死亡或因心力衰竭住院。总之,尽管心电图形态相似,但 iLBBB 患者的 LV 不同步程度更大,LV 前负荷和后负荷是主要决定因素。LV 不同步的存在与预后之间没有关联。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验