Rosenstein Brent, Rye Meaghan, Roussac Alexa, Naghdi Neda, Macedo Luciana G, Elliott James, DeMont Richard, Weber Michael H, Pepin Véronique, Dover Geoffrey, Fortin Maryse
Department of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar 11:21925682251324490. doi: 10.1177/21925682251324490.
Study DesignProspective Randomized Controlled Trial.ObjectivesTo investigate the effect of combined motor control and isolated lumbar strengthening exercise (MC + ILEX) vs general exercise (GE) on upper lumbar paraspinal muscle volume and composition, strength and patient outcomes in individuals with chronic low back pain (LBP).Methods50 participants with nonspecific chronic LBP were randomly allocated (1:1) to each group (MC + ILEX or GE) and underwent a 12-week supervised intervention program 2 times per week. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed at baseline, 6-weeks and 12-weeks to examine the impact of each intervention on multifidus (MF) and erector spinae (ES) muscle volume (cm) and fatty infiltration (%FI) at L1-L2, L2-L3 and L3-L4.ResultsOur results revealed no significant between-groups findings for MF and ES %FI and volume, and patient-reported psychosocial measures. However, both groups had significant within-groups decreases in MF %FI at L1-L2, L2-L3 and L3-L4, with concomitant decreases in MF volume at L1-L2 and L2-L3, and at L3-L4 in the GE group. Each group displayed significant improvements in Kinesiophobia, while only MC + ILEX had significant improvements in pain catastrophizing, anxiety, depression and sleep. Lastly, significant correlations were found between change in Kinesiophobia and upper lumbar MF %FI, and between change in strength and lower lumbar MF and ES size.ConclusionsBoth exercise interventions may help reduce upper lumbar MF %FI in individuals with chronic LBP, while MC + ILEX could significantly improve important patient outcomes. Our results support the idea that improvements in paraspinal muscle health associate with better patient outcomes. Further high-quality imaging studies are needed to explore these relationships.
研究设计
前瞻性随机对照试验。
目的
探讨运动控制与孤立性腰椎强化训练(MC + ILEX)相结合与一般运动(GE)对慢性下腰痛(LBP)患者上腰椎旁肌肉体积和组成、力量及患者预后的影响。
方法
50例非特异性慢性LBP患者被随机(1:1)分配至每组(MC + ILEX或GE),并接受为期12周、每周2次的监督干预计划。在基线、6周和12周时进行磁共振成像,以检查每种干预对L1 - L2、L2 - L3和L3 - L4节段多裂肌(MF)和竖脊肌(ES)肌肉体积(cm)和脂肪浸润(%FI)的影响。
结果
我们的结果显示,两组之间在MF和ES的%FI、体积以及患者报告的心理社会指标方面无显著差异。然而,两组在L1 - L2、L2 - L3和L3 - L4节段的MF %FI均有组内显著下降,GE组在L1 - L2和L2 - L3节段以及L3 - L4节段的MF体积也随之下降。每组在运动恐惧方面均有显著改善,而只有MC + ILEX组在疼痛灾难化、焦虑、抑郁和睡眠方面有显著改善。最后,发现运动恐惧的变化与上腰椎MF %FI之间、力量变化与下腰椎MF和ES大小之间存在显著相关性。
结论
两种运动干预都可能有助于降低慢性LBP患者上腰椎的MF %FI,而MC + ILEX可以显著改善重要的患者预后。我们的结果支持这样一种观点,即椎旁肌肉健康的改善与更好的患者预后相关。需要进一步的高质量影像学研究来探索这些关系。