Suppr超能文献

一种用于诊断系统性红斑狼疮的高亲和力抗双链DNA IgG酶联免疫吸附测定法的评估

Evaluation of a high avidity anti-dsDNA IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus.

作者信息

Suh-Lailam Brenda B, Chiaro Tyson R, Davis K Wayne, Wilson Andrew R, Tebo Anne E

机构信息

ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT 84104, United States.

出版信息

Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2011;4(8):748-54. Epub 2011 Oct 30.

Abstract

The high avidity (HA) anti-dsDNA IgG ELISA is considered highly specific for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The main objective of this study was to determine the performance of this test with existing assays for detecting anti-dsDNA IgG antibodies as well as assess its analytical characteristics. For method comparison studies, we investigated the correlation between the HA ELISA with 8 other assays for the detection of dsDNA IgG antibodies namely; six anti-dsDNA IgG ELISA, the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test (CLIFT) and an in-house developed Farr radioimmunoassay (RIA). Overall, 125 patient (100 ANA-positive, 25 CLIFT-tested) and 100 healthy control samples were tested. The assay was also evaluated for imprecision, lot-to-lot consistency and the effect of interfering substances using commercial quality control materials based on the manufacturer's claims unless otherwise stated. Of the 100 ANA positive samples, 18 were positive in the HA ELISA with significant levels of antibodies in the six ELISAs and CLIFT. The HA ELISA had a specificity of 100% with an overall agreement of 84% with the RIA. Intra - and inter-assay imprecision ranged from 13.9-16.5% and the reproducibility between lots based on qualitative interpretation was 100%. Hemoglobin, bilirubin and lipemia showed variable interference with assay performance based on the manufacturer's claims and our in-house protocol. Our data suggest that the HA ELISA although less sensitive than the other dsDNA IgG assays evaluated, is specific and predicts high levels of anti-dsDNA IgG antibodies.

摘要

高亲和力(HA)抗双链DNA IgG酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)被认为对系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的诊断具有高度特异性。本研究的主要目的是确定该检测方法与现有检测抗双链DNA IgG抗体的方法相比的性能,并评估其分析特性。在方法比较研究中,我们调查了HA ELISA与其他8种检测双链DNA IgG抗体的方法之间的相关性,即6种抗双链DNA IgG ELISA、克氏锥虫免疫荧光试验(CLIFT)和一种自行开发的Farr放射免疫测定(RIA)。总共检测了125份患者样本(100份ANA阳性、25份经CLIFT检测)和100份健康对照样本。除非另有说明,还根据制造商的声明,使用商业质量控制材料对该检测方法的不精密度、批次间一致性和干扰物质的影响进行了评估。在100份ANA阳性样本中,18份在HA ELISA中呈阳性,在6种ELISA和CLIFT中抗体水平显著。HA ELISA的特异性为100%,与RIA的总体一致性为84%。批内和批间不精密度范围为13.9 - 16.5%,基于定性解释的批次间再现性为100%。根据制造商的声明和我们的内部方案,血红蛋白、胆红素和脂血对检测性能显示出不同程度的干扰。我们的数据表明,HA ELISA虽然比所评估的其他双链DNA IgG检测方法敏感性低,但具有特异性,并且能够预测抗双链DNA IgG抗体的高水平。

相似文献

6
Laboratory evaluation of anti-dsDNA antibodies.
Clin Chim Acta. 2022 Mar 1;528:34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.12.029. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
9
Assessment of a high-avidity IgG ANAs for the diagnosis and activity prediction of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Sep;39(9):2619-2629. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05040-4. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
10
Distribution of IgG subclass anti-nuclear antibodies (ANAs) in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Lupus. 2021 May;30(6):901-912. doi: 10.1177/0961203321995242. Epub 2021 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of a high-avidity IgG ANAs for the diagnosis and activity prediction of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Sep;39(9):2619-2629. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05040-4. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
2
The avidity of PR3-ANCA in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis during follow-up.
Clin Exp Immunol. 2016 Aug;185(2):141-7. doi: 10.1111/cei.12796. Epub 2016 May 23.
5
The spectrum of anti-chromatin/nucleosome autoantibodies: independent and interdependent biomarkers of disease.
J Immunol Res. 2014;2014:368274. doi: 10.1155/2014/368274. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
6
Evaluation of ENA-6 Profile by ELISA Immunoassay in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematodes.
Autoimmune Dis. 2012;2012:321614. doi: 10.1155/2012/321614. Epub 2012 Oct 11.

本文引用的文献

4
Sensitivity and specificity of autoantibody tests in the differential diagnosis of lupus nephritis.
Lupus. 2009 Dec;18(14):1276-80. doi: 10.1177/0961203309345753. Epub 2009 Oct 23.
6
Anti-dsDNA antibody testing in the clinic: Farr or ELISA?
Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2007 Feb;3(2):72-3. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0398.
8
Anti-dsDNA antibody testing by Farr and ELISA techniques is not equivalent.
J Rheumatol. 2006 Sep;33(9):1785-8. Epub 2006 Aug 15.
9
Detection of antibodies to dsDNA: an overview of laboratory assays.
Lupus. 2006;15(7):403-7. doi: 10.1191/0961203306lu2324oa.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验