Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Center Munich, Germany.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Feb;143(2):310-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.060. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
Although the procedural feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve implantation has been shown by multiple groups, longer-term data are rare. We report on 2-year follow-up clinical and echocardiographic results after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in 227 patients.
Patients' mean age was 81 ± 7 years, 59% were female, mean European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation was 21% ± 14%, mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 7% ± 5%, and access routes were transfemoral (n = 164), transapical (n = 54), axillary (n = 5), or transaortic (n = 4). A CoreValve (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) prosthesis was implanted in 174 patients, and a SAPIEN prosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, Calif) was implanted in 53 patients. Clinical and echocardiographic investigations were performed at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years.
Survival was 88.5% at 30 days, 75.9% at 6 months, 74.5% at 1 year, and 64.4% at 2 years. Patients improved significantly in New York Heart Association class after 6 months (from 3.2 ± 0.5 to 1.7 ± 0.7, P < .001) and up to 2 years (1.9 ± 0.7). Cumulative incidences of myocardial infarction, stroke, and life-threatening or major bleeding were 2.7%, 6.2%, and 16.2% at 2 years, respectively. The postprocedural mean transprosthetic gradient was 12 ± 4 mm Hg for all valves and did not change up to 2 years, and the effective orifice area was 1.5 ± 0.4 cm² with no change over 2 years of follow-up. Moderate or severe prosthetic regurgitation was present in 8% of patients at 2 years. In 6% of patients, the paravalvular or valvular regurgitation grade increased significantly over time.
With excellent functional recovery of the patients, good systolic valve function, and overall low morbidity at 2 years, transcatheter aortic valve implantation may be considered the treatment of choice for aortic valve stenosis in elderly patients with an increased risk for surgery with a heart-lung machine.
尽管多个团队已经证明了经导管主动脉瓣植入术的程序可行性,但很少有长期数据。我们报告了 227 例患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术后 2 年的临床和超声心动图随访结果。
患者平均年龄为 81±7 岁,59%为女性,平均欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统为 21%±14%,平均胸外科医生协会评分为 7%±5%,入路为经股(n=164)、经心尖(n=54)、腋动脉(n=5)或经主动脉(n=4)。174 例患者植入了 CoreValve(美敦力公司,明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯)瓣膜,53 例患者植入了 SAPIEN 瓣膜(爱德华兹生命科学公司,加利福尼亚州欧文)。在 6 个月、1 年和 2 年时进行临床和超声心动图检查。
术后 30 天生存率为 88.5%,术后 6 个月为 75.9%,术后 1 年为 74.5%,术后 2 年为 64.4%。患者在术后 6 个月(从 3.2±0.5 至 1.7±0.7,P<.001)和 2 年(1.9±0.7)时纽约心功能分级显著改善。术后 2 年心肌梗死、卒中和危及生命或主要出血的累积发生率分别为 2.7%、6.2%和 16.2%。所有瓣膜的术后平均跨瓣梯度为 12±4mmHg,2 年内无变化,有效瓣口面积为 1.5±0.4cm²,2 年随访期间无变化。2 年后有 8%的患者存在中度或重度瓣周反流。6%的患者瓣周或瓣上反流程度随时间显著增加。
经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者功能恢复良好,收缩期瓣膜功能良好,2 年总发病率低,对于因心肺机手术风险增加而不能接受手术的老年主动脉瓣狭窄患者,可考虑作为首选治疗方法。