• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严格与宽松的围手术期血糖目标范围对冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。

Strict versus liberal target range for perioperative glucose in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA 22042, USA.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Feb;143(2):318-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.070. Epub 2011 Dec 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.070
PMID:22137804
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that a liberal blood glucose strategy (121-180 mg/dL) is not inferior to a strict blood glucose strategy (90-120 mg/dL) for outcomes in patients after first-time isolated coronary artery bypass grafting and is superior for glucose control and target blood glucose management.

METHODS

A total of 189 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were investigated in this prospective randomized study to compare 2 glucose control strategies on patient perioperative outcomes. Three methods of analyses (intention to treat, completer, and per protocol) were conducted. Observed power was robust (>80%) for significant results.

RESULTS

The groups were similar on preoperative hemoglobin A(1c) and number of diabetic patients. The liberal group was found to be noninferior to the strict group for perioperative complications and superior on glucose control and target range management. The liberal group had significantly fewer patients with hypoglycemic events (<60 mg/dL; P < .001), but severe hypoglycemic events (<40 mg/dL) were rare and no group differences were found (P = .23). These results were found with all 3 methods of analysis except for blood glucose variability, maximum blood glucose, and perioperative atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that maintenance of blood glucose in a liberal range after coronary artery bypass grafting led to similar outcomes compared with a strict target range and was superior in glucose control and target range management. On the basis of the results of this study, a target blood glucose range of 121 to 180 mg/dL is recommended for patients after coronary artery bypass grafting as advocated by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验以下假设,即宽松血糖策略(121-180mg/dL)在首次冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者的结局方面不劣于严格血糖策略(90-120mg/dL),并且在血糖控制和目标血糖管理方面更优。

方法

本前瞻性随机研究共纳入 189 例行冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者,旨在比较 2 种血糖控制策略对患者围手术期结局的影响。采用意向治疗、完成者和方案分析 3 种方法进行分析。观察效能对显著结果具有较高的稳健性(>80%)。

结果

两组患者术前糖化血红蛋白 A1c 和糖尿病患者数量相似。与严格组相比,宽松组在围手术期并发症方面无差异,但在血糖控制和目标范围管理方面更优。宽松组低血糖事件(<60mg/dL)显著减少(P<0.001),但严重低血糖事件(<40mg/dL)罕见,且组间无差异(P=0.23)。除血糖变异性、最大血糖和围手术期心房颤动外,所有 3 种分析方法均得出了这一结果。

结论

本研究表明,冠状动脉旁路移植术后维持血糖在宽松范围内与严格目标范围相比可产生相似的结局,且在血糖控制和目标范围管理方面更优。基于本研究的结果,推荐将 121-180mg/dL 的目标血糖范围用于冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者,这与胸外科医师学会的建议一致。

相似文献

1
Strict versus liberal target range for perioperative glucose in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized controlled trial.严格与宽松的围手术期血糖目标范围对冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Feb;143(2):318-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.070. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
2
Superiority of moderate control of hyperglycemia to tight control in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.接受冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的高血糖适度控制优于严格控制。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Feb;141(2):543-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.10.005. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
3
Diabetic control and coronary artery bypass: effect on short-term outcomes.糖尿病控制与冠状动脉搭桥术:对短期结局的影响。
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2013 Jun;21(3):281-7. doi: 10.1177/0218492312451983.
4
Changing glucose control target and risk of surgical site infection in a Southeast Asian population.改变东南亚人群的血糖控制目标与手术部位感染风险。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Jan;149(1):323-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.08.076. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
5
Usefulness of perioperative blood glucose control in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术患者围手术期血糖控制的效用
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Oct;55(10):409-15. doi: 10.1007/s11748-007-0153-3.
6
Effects of aggressive versus moderate glycemic control on clinical outcomes in diabetic coronary artery bypass graft patients.强化与适度血糖控制对糖尿病冠状动脉旁路移植术患者临床结局的影响。
Ann Surg. 2011 Sep;254(3):458-63; discussion 463-4. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822c5d78.
7
Continuous insulin infusion reduces mortality in patients with diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.持续胰岛素输注可降低接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的糖尿病患者的死亡率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 May;125(5):1007-21. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2003.181.
8
Effects of Glucose Variability on Short-Term Outcomes in Non-Diabetic Patients After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Retrospective Observational Study.葡萄糖变异性对冠状动脉旁路移植术后非糖尿病患者短期结局的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。
Heart Lung Circ. 2019 Oct;28(10):1580-1586. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
9
Prospective Study of Postoperative Glycemic Control with a Standardized Insulin Infusion Protocol after Infrainguinal Bypass and Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.股腘动脉旁路移植术和开放性腹主动脉瘤修复术后采用标准化胰岛素输注方案进行术后血糖控制的前瞻性研究
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;44:211-220. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 May 11.
10
Randomized Controlled Trial of Intensive Versus Conservative Glucose Control in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: GLUCO-CABG Trial.冠状动脉搭桥手术患者强化与保守血糖控制的随机对照试验:GLUCO-CABG试验
Diabetes Care. 2015 Sep;38(9):1665-72. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0303. Epub 2015 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Perioperative glycemic control in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.心脏手术患者围手术期的血糖控制
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2025 Mar;22(1):44-52. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2025.148548. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
2
Association of stress hyperglycemia ratio with short-term and long-term prognosis in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting across different glucose metabolism states: a large-scale cohort study.不同糖代谢状态下冠状动脉搭桥术患者应激性高血糖比值与短期和长期预后的关系:一项大规模队列研究
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Apr 24;24(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12933-025-02682-z.
3
Perioperative glycaemic control for people with diabetes undergoing surgery.
手术治疗糖尿病患者的围手术期血糖控制
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 1;8(8):CD007315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007315.pub3.
4
Perioperative glycemic management in adults presenting for elective cardiac and non-cardiac surgery.择期心脏手术和非心脏手术成年患者的围手术期血糖管理。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2023 Apr 29;12(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13741-023-00302-6.
5
Clinical challenges of glycemic control in the intensive care unit: A narrative review.重症监护病房血糖控制的临床挑战:一项叙述性综述。
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Nov 6;10(31):11260-11272. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i31.11260.
6
Intensive versus conservative glycemic control in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A protocol for systematic review of randomised controlled trials.冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者强化与保守血糖控制的比较:系统评价随机对照试验的方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 18;17(10):e0276228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276228. eCollection 2022.
7
Glycemic Control Regimens in the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.血糖控制方案在预防手术部位感染中的应用:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2022 Mar 25;9:855409. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.855409. eCollection 2022.
8
Is intensive glucose control bad for critically ill patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.强化血糖控制对危重症患者有害吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 12;16(9):1658-1675. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.43447. eCollection 2020.
9
Insight Into the Perioperative Management of Type 2 Diabetes.2型糖尿病围手术期管理的见解
Cureus. 2020 Feb 4;12(2):e6878. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6878.
10
Prevention of Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: A Review of Current Strategies.心脏手术相关急性肾损伤的预防:当前策略综述
Anesthesiol Clin. 2019 Dec;37(4):729-749. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Sep 21.