University of Massachusetts Medical School, Rheumatology Center, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, USA.
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Aug;25(4):497-507. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2011.10.007.
As very effective targeted biological therapies have become available to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA), remission is now the goal of treatment. Since 1981, efforts have been undertaken to develop criteria for clinical remission in RA. Although several different measures of disease activity have been proposed, many issues remain unresolved. Active joint inflammation, even if involving only a few joints, negatively impacts a patient's quality of life and may ultimately result in structural damage. Thus, a low disease activity state (LDAS), which has been adopted as the target in clinical trials of 'treat to target', may not be the optimal treatment target in clinical practice. Similarly, the definitions of remission used in clinical trials may not be appropriate for use in daily clinical practice because some allow for the presence of several tender and swollen joints. Measures of disease activity do not necessarily correlate with structural remission, which implies halting progression of radiographic evidence of damage over time. Because no single measure of RA disease activity fully quantifies the global burden of disease, rheumatologists must follow multiple parameters to assess disease activity thoroughly and to adjust treatment optimally.
随着针对类风湿关节炎(RA)非常有效的靶向生物疗法的出现,目前的治疗目标是实现缓解。自 1981 年以来,人们一直在努力制定 RA 临床缓解的标准。尽管已经提出了几种不同的疾病活动衡量标准,但仍有许多问题尚未解决。即使仅涉及少数关节的活动性关节炎症,也会对患者的生活质量产生负面影响,并最终导致结构损伤。因此,低疾病活动状态(LDAS)已被采纳为“靶向治疗”临床试验的目标,但在临床实践中可能不是最佳的治疗目标。同样,临床试验中使用的缓解定义可能不适合日常临床实践,因为有些定义允许存在几个压痛和肿胀关节。疾病活动的衡量标准不一定与结构缓解相关,这意味着随着时间的推移,要阻止影像学证据显示的损害进展。由于没有单一的 RA 疾病活动衡量标准可以完全量化疾病的整体负担,因此风湿病医生必须遵循多个参数来全面评估疾病活动,并进行最佳治疗调整。