Kazama M
First Department of Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine.
Rinsho Ketsueki. 1990 Jun;31(6):769-75.
Ten controlled plasmas and 4 thromboplastin reagents were distributed to 75 laboratories for measurement of prothrombin time (PT). The results were converted to prothrombin activity (PA). prothrombin ratio (PR) and international normalized ratio (INR). Among the 4 different ways of expression, the discrepancy between the results obtained by the different reagents was the smallest when the results were expressed by INR. However, the discrepancy of the results was still remained because of the different assay methods used routinely at these laboratories, even with the use of ISI/NR system (Instrumentation effects). In this study, reference curve of prothrombin time: INR was created using INR reference plasmas, which were selected from commercial control plasma using a standard thromboplastin reagent. INR's of 108 patients' plasmas were calculated by ISI/INR system on one hand, and by the use of the reference curve of the prothrombin: INR on the other hand. It was found that the discrepancy of the results obtained by different assay methods was significantly improved by the latter method, compared to those obtained by the conventional ISI/INR system.
将10份定值血浆和4种凝血活酶试剂分发给75个实验室,用于测定凝血酶原时间(PT)。结果换算为凝血酶原活性(PA)、凝血酶原比值(PR)和国际标准化比值(INR)。在4种不同的表达方法中,以INR表示结果时,不同试剂所得结果之间的差异最小。然而,由于这些实验室常规使用的检测方法不同,即使使用ISI/NR系统(仪器效应),结果差异仍然存在。在本研究中,使用从市售对照血浆中选用标准凝血活酶试剂选出的INR参比血浆建立了凝血酶原时间-INR参比曲线。一方面通过ISI/INR系统计算108例患者血浆的INR,另一方面使用凝血酶原-INR参比曲线计算。结果发现,与传统ISI/INR系统相比,后一种方法显著改善了不同检测方法所得结果之间的差异。