Suppr超能文献

老年人离心偏置与传统抗阻训练的效果比较。

Effects of eccentrically biased versus conventional weight training in older adults.

机构信息

RMIT University, Health Innovations Research Institute and School of Medical Sciences, Bundoora West Campus, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Jun;44(6):1167-76. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182442ecd.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We compared the effects of eccentrically biased (EB) and conventional (CONV) resistance training on muscle architecture, one-repetition maximum (1RM), isometric strength, isokinetic force-velocity characteristics, functional capacity, and pulse wave velocity in older men and women.

METHODS

Twenty-eight older adults participated in the study (mean ± SD: age = 68 ± 5 yr). Of these, 13 were allocated to a waitlist control, 10 of whom progressed to training (CONV, n = 12; EB, n = 13). Training was twice a week for 16 wk. EB involved three sets of 10 concentric lifts at 50% of 1RM with the eccentric portion of repetitions performed unilaterally, alternating between limbs with each repetition. CONV involved two sets of 10 repetitions at 75% of 1RM. EB and CONV were matched for total work. Isokinetic knee extensor strength was assessed across a range of velocities (0-360°·s(-1)). Functional capacity was assessed via a 6-m fast walk test, a timed up and go test, stair climb and descent power test, and vertical jump test. Vastus lateralis and gastrocnemius medialis architecture were assessed using ultrasonography.

RESULTS

Both EB and CONV improved 1RM (Δ 23%-35%, P < 0.01). Compared to the control group, both training regimens improved 6-m fast walk (Δ 5%-7%, P < 0.01) and concentric torque at 60 and 120°·s(-1) (Δ 6%-8%, P < 0.05). Significant improvements were evident in EB for isometric and concentric torque at 240 and 360°·s(-1) (Δ 6%-11%, P < 0.05), vastus lateralis thickness (Δ 5%, P < 0.05), and stair climb (Δ 5%, P < 0.01). Timed up and go (Δ 5%, P < 0.01), stair descent (Δ 4%, P < 0.05), and vertical jump (Δ 7%, P < 0.01) improved in CONV. Pulse wave velocity, pennation angle, and fascicle length remained unchanged in both training groups.

CONCLUSIONS

EB seems superior to CONV at increasing torque at high contraction velocities, whereas CONV seems more effective at improving some functional performance measures and vertical jump. This has important implications for preserving functional capacity.

摘要

简介

我们比较了偏心偏置(EB)和传统(CONV)抗阻训练对老年人肌肉结构、最大重复次数(1RM)、等长力量、等速肌力-速度特征、功能能力和脉搏波速度的影响。

方法

28 名老年人参与了这项研究(平均±标准差:年龄=68±5 岁)。其中 13 人被分配到候补对照组,其中 10 人进展为训练(CONV,n=12;EB,n=13)。每周训练两次,共 16 周。EB 包括三组 50%1RM 的 10 次向心提升,每组重复 10 次,重复的偏心部分在单侧进行,每次重复交替使用肢体。CONV 包括两组 10 次重复,重复强度为 75%1RM。EB 和 CONV 的总工作量相匹配。通过一系列速度(0-360°·s(-1))评估等速膝关节伸肌力量。通过 6 米快速步行测试、计时站立和行走测试、上下楼梯力量测试和垂直跳跃测试评估功能能力。使用超声评估股外侧肌和腓肠肌内侧肌的结构。

结果

EB 和 CONV 均能提高 1RM(增加 23%-35%,P<0.01)。与对照组相比,两种训练方案均能提高 6 米快速步行(增加 5%-7%,P<0.01)和 60°和 120°·s(-1)的向心扭矩(增加 6%-8%,P<0.05)。EB 组在 240°和 360°·s(-1)的等长和向心扭矩(增加 6%-11%,P<0.05)、股外侧肌厚度(增加 5%,P<0.05)和上下楼梯能力(增加 5%,P<0.01)方面均有显著改善。CONV 组的计时起立行走(增加 5%,P<0.01)、下楼梯(增加 4%,P<0.05)和垂直跳跃(增加 7%,P<0.01)也有所改善。两种训练组的脉搏波速度、肌纤维角和肌小节长度均无变化。

结论

EB 似乎比 CONV 更能增加高速收缩时的扭矩,而 CONV 似乎更能提高一些功能表现测量和垂直跳跃。这对保持功能能力有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验