Physical Activity, Sports and Health Research Group, Department of Kinesiology, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Exp Gerontol. 2013 Nov;48(11):1351-61. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
Muscle adaptations can be induced by high-resistance exercise. Despite being potentially more suitable for older adults, low-resistance exercise protocols have been less investigated. We compared the effects of high- and low-resistance training on muscle volume, muscle strength, and force-velocity characteristics. Fifty-six older adults were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of leg press and leg extension training at either HIGH (2×10-15 repetitions at 80% of one repetition maximum (1RM)), LOW (1×80-100 repetitions at 20% of 1RM), or LOW+ (1×60 repetitions at 20% of 1RM, followed by 1×10-20 repetitions at 40% of 1RM). All protocols ended with muscle failure. Leg press and leg extension of 1RM were measured at baseline and post intervention and before the first training session in weeks 5 and 9. At baseline and post intervention, muscle volume (MV) was measured by CT-scan. A Biodex dynamometer evaluated knee extensor static peak torque in different knee angles (PT(stat90°), PT(stat120°), PT(stat150°)), dynamic peak torque at different speeds (PT(dyn60°s)(-1), PT(dyn180°s)(-1), PT(dyn240°s)(-1)), and speed of movement at 20% (S20), 40% (S40), and 60% (S60) of PTstat90°. HIGH and LOW+ resulted in greater improvements in 1RM strength than LOW (p<0.05). These differences were already apparent after week 5. Similar gains were found between groups in MV, PT(stat), PT(dyn60°s)(-1), and PT(dyn180°s)(-1). No changes were reported in speed of movement. HIGH tended to improve PT(dyn240°s)(-1) more than LOW or LOW+ (p=0.064). In conclusion, high- and low-resistance exercises ending with muscle failure may be similarly effective for hypertrophy. High-resistance training led to a higher increase in 1RM strength than low-resistance training (20% of 1RM), but this difference disappeared when using a mixed low-resistance protocol in which the resistance was intensified within a single exercise set (40% of 1RM). Our findings support the need for more research on low-resistance programs in older age, in particular long-term training studies and studies focusing on residual effects after training cessation.
肌肉适应性可以通过高阻力运动来诱导。尽管低阻力运动方案可能更适合老年人,但对其的研究却较少。我们比较了高阻力和低阻力训练对肌肉体积、肌肉力量和力量-速度特征的影响。56 名老年人被随机分配到为期 12 周的腿部按压和腿部伸展训练中,分别采用 HIGH(2×10-15 次重复,80%的 1 次重复最大重量(1RM))、LOW(1×80-100 次重复,20%的 1RM)或 LOW+(1×60 次重复,20%的 1RM,然后进行 1×10-20 次重复,40%的 1RM)。所有方案均以肌肉疲劳结束。在基线和干预后以及第 5 周和第 9 周的第一次训练课前,测量腿部按压和腿部伸展的 1RM。在基线和干预后,通过 CT 扫描测量肌肉体积(MV)。Biodex 测力计评估不同膝关节角度(PT(stat90°)、PT(stat120°)、PT(stat150°))的膝关节伸肌静态峰值扭矩、不同速度(PT(dyn60°s)(-1)、PT(dyn180°s)(-1)、PT(dyn240°s)(-1))的动态峰值扭矩以及 20%(S20)、40%(S40)和 60%(S60)的 PTstat90°的运动速度。HIGH 和 LOW+ 比 LOW 更能显著提高 1RM 强度(p<0.05)。这些差异在第 5 周后就已经很明显了。各组之间在 MV、PT(stat)、PT(dyn60°s)(-1)和 PT(dyn180°s)(-1)方面的增益相似。运动速度没有变化。与 LOW 或 LOW+ 相比,HIGH 倾向于更显著地提高 PT(dyn240°s)(-1)(p=0.064)。总之,以肌肉疲劳结束的高阻力和低阻力运动对于肌肉肥大可能同样有效。高阻力训练比低阻力训练(20%的 1RM)更能显著提高 1RM 强度,但当在单一训练组中增加阻力(40%的 1RM)时,使用混合低阻力方案,这种差异就消失了。我们的研究结果支持在老年人群中开展更多关于低阻力方案的研究,特别是长期训练研究和关注训练停止后的残留效应的研究。