Pomeranz Jennifer L
Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, Yale University, 309 Edwards Street - Box 208369, New Haven, CT 06520-8369, USA.
Health Matrix Clevel. 2011;21(2):521-53.
Food and beverage marketing directed at children is of increasing concern to the public health and legal communities. The new administration at the Federal Trade Commission and abundant science on the topic make it a particularly opportune time for the government to reconsider regulating marketing directed at youth. This Article analyzes the Commission's authority to regulate food and beverage marketing directed at children under its jurisdiction over unfair and deceptive acts and practices to determine which avenue is most viable. The author finds that the Federal Trade Commission has the authority to regulate deceptive marketing practices directed at vulnerable populations. Although the Commission can issue individual orders, its remedial power to initiate rules would better address the pervasiveness of modern marketing practices. The Commission does not currently have the power to regulate unfair marketing to children; however, even if Congress reinstated this authority, the Commission's authority over deceptive marketing may be preferable to regulate these practices. Deceptive communications are not protected by the First Amendment and the deceptive standard matches the science associated with marketing to children. The Federal Trade Commission has the authority to initiate rulemaking in the realm of food and beverage marketing to children as deceptive communications in interstate commerce, in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act. However, to effectuate this process, Congress would need to grant the Commission the authority to do so under the Administrative Procedures Act.
针对儿童的食品和饮料营销日益引起公共卫生和法律界的关注。联邦贸易委员会的新管理层以及关于该主题的大量科学研究,使得现在成为政府重新考虑对针对青少年的营销进行监管的特别合适时机。本文分析了委员会依据其对不公平和欺骗性行为及做法的管辖权,对针对儿童的食品和饮料营销进行监管的权力,以确定哪种途径最可行。作者发现,联邦贸易委员会有权监管针对弱势群体的欺骗性营销行为。尽管委员会可以发布个别命令,但其启动规则的补救权力将能更好地应对现代营销行为的普遍性。委员会目前没有权力监管对儿童的不公平营销;然而,即使国会恢复这一权力,委员会对欺骗性营销的权力可能更适合监管这些行为。欺骗性通信不受第一修正案保护,且欺骗标准与针对儿童营销的相关科学相匹配。联邦贸易委员会有权就针对儿童的食品和饮料营销领域发起规则制定,将其视为州际商业中的欺骗性通信,违反了《联邦贸易委员会法》。然而,为了实现这一过程,国会需要根据《行政程序法》授予委员会这样做的权力。