Banja J D
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Sep;75(9):1015-8.
A much discussed issue in contemporary discussions of health care reform is the considerable competition that is anticipated to occur among providers. An inevitable aspect of this competition will be the ways health care services are presented in the marketplace through advertising and other forms of promotional literature. Considerable concern has already emerged among certain rehabilitation professionals, however, that advertising and marketing practices in rehabilitation must cohere with ethical standards. This article will discuss certain aspects of those standards, particularly as they have evolved from the Federal Trade Commission's definition of and rulings on deceptive practices in advertising. Salient aspects of the Commission's 1983 definition of deception will be related to rehabilitation by way of examining instances of rehabilitation advertising and marketing that might satisfy the Commission's definition of deception. The article will conclude with certain recommendations, principally drawn from various Federal Trade Commission rulings, that might be useful to individuals or corporate entities who advertise or market rehabilitation services.
在当代医疗保健改革讨论中,一个备受热议的问题是预计医疗服务提供者之间将展开激烈竞争。这种竞争不可避免的一个方面是医疗保健服务在市场上通过广告和其他形式的宣传资料进行展示的方式。然而,一些康复专业人士已经开始高度关注,康复领域的广告和营销行为必须符合道德标准。本文将讨论这些标准的某些方面,特别是它们如何从联邦贸易委员会对广告中欺骗性做法的定义和裁决演变而来。通过审视可能符合委员会欺骗性定义的康复广告和营销实例,将把委员会1983年对欺骗的定义的突出方面与康复联系起来。本文将以某些建议作为结尾,这些建议主要源自联邦贸易委员会的各种裁决,可能对宣传或营销康复服务的个人或企业实体有所帮助。