Suppr超能文献

不同牙间刷对清洁牙齿和种植体邻面效果的随机对照、双盲交叉研究。

Effectiveness of different interdental brushes on cleaning the interproximal surfaces of teeth and implants: a randomized controlled, double-blind cross-over study.

机构信息

Implant Dentistry, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):635-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02387.x. Epub 2011 Dec 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the interproximal cleansing efficacy of the novel, waist-shaped Circum brush (Topcaredent, Switzerland; CB) with that of a straight soft interdental brush (IB) (TePe, Sweden; SB) on posterior surfaces.

MATERIAL & METHODS: Eight patients after completion of initial periodontal therapy abolished oral hygiene for 3 days. Baseline plaque scores (PlI, Silness & Löe ) were assessed on eight surfaces of all premolars and molars. Subsequently, an instructed nurse applied at random one of the two IB, three times per interdental space . Following this, registration of the PlI was repeated by the same blinded examiner. After a 2-week recovery, patients abolished oral hygiene practices for another 3 days. Again, pre-and post-brushing PlI were recorded by the same examiner. The second IB was now applied.

RESULTS

Patient mean PlI and site PlI were evaluated before and after application of the SB or CB respectively. Paired t-tests were performed to yield statistically significant differences. The reduction of biofilm from before to after the use of the IB on a subject basis was highly significant (P < 0.0001). The mean PlI after the use of the CB was significantly lower than after the use of the SB (P < 0.0001). Comparing the PlI of the line angles (MB, ML, DB, DL), significantly more biofilm had been removed by applying CB compared with SB (P < 0.0001). Moreover, comparing the PlI of the buccal (MB, DB) or the lingual line angles (DL, ML) yielded a significantly higher reduction of biofilm in favour of the CB (P < 0.0001). The reduction of the PlI in the mid-interproximal portion, both mesially and distally did not differ significantly between CB and ST. No biofilm reduction was seen on the buccal sites with either IB.

CONCLUSION

The application of the waist-shaped Circum IB resulted in significantly lower PlI scores than the use of a straight IB. This was predominantly due to the higher cleansing effect of the waist-shaped CB on the buccal and lingual line angles.

摘要

目的

比较新型腰形 Circum 牙刷(Topcaredent,瑞士;CB)与直型软牙间刷(TePe,瑞典;SB)在邻面清洁效果上的差异。

材料与方法

8 名完成初始牙周治疗的患者在 3 天内停止口腔卫生。在所有前磨牙和磨牙的 8 个表面上评估基线菌斑指数(PlI,Silness 和 Löe)。随后,一名受过指导的护士随机应用两种牙间刷中的一种,每次使用 3 次,每次使用一个牙间空间。完成这一步后,由同一名盲检医生重复记录 PlI。2 周恢复期后,患者再次停止口腔卫生习惯 3 天。同样,由同一名盲检医生记录刷牙前后的 PlI。现在应用第二种牙间刷。

结果

对每位患者应用 SB 或 CB 前后的患者平均 PlI 和部位 PlI 进行评估。进行配对 t 检验以得出有统计学意义的差异。从使用 IB 前到使用后,生物膜的减少在个体基础上具有高度显著意义(P < 0.0001)。使用 CB 后,平均 PlI 明显低于使用 SB 后(P < 0.0001)。比较线角(MB、ML、DB、DL)的 PlI,应用 CB 比应用 SB 去除更多的生物膜(P < 0.0001)。此外,比较颊侧(MB、DB)或舌侧线角(DL、ML)的 PlI,使用 CB 更有利于降低生物膜,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.0001)。近中-远中部位的 PlI 减少在 CB 和 ST 之间无显著差异。两种牙间刷在颊侧部位均未观察到生物膜减少。

结论

应用腰形 Circum 牙间刷的 PlI 评分明显低于使用直型牙间刷。这主要是由于腰形 CB 对颊侧和舌侧线角的清洁效果更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验