Hasman A, Ammenwerth E, Dickhaus H, Knaup P, Lovis C, Mantas J, Maojo V, Martin-Sanchez F J, Musen M, Patel V L, Surjan G, Talmon J L, Sarkar I N
Department of Medical Informatics, University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam Z. O., The Netherlands.
Methods Inf Med. 2011;50(6):508-24. doi: 10.3414/ME11-06-0003.
BACKGROUND: Biomedical informatics is a broad discipline that borrows many methods and techniques from other disciplines. OBJECTIVE: To reflect a) on the character of biomedical informatics and to determine whether it is multi-disciplinary or inter-disciplinary; b) on the question whether biomedical informatics is more than the sum of its supporting disciplines and c) on the position of biomedical informatics with respect to related disciplines. METHOD: Inviting an international group of experts in biomedical informatics and related disciplines on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of Methods of Information in Medicine to present their viewpoints. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: This paper contains the reflections of a number of the invited experts on the character of biomedical informatics. Most of the authors agree that biomedical informatics is an interdisciplinary field of study where researchers with different scientific backgrounds alone or in combination carry out research. Biomedical informatics is a very broad scientific field and still expanding, yet comprised of a constructive aspect (designing and building systems). One author expressed that the essence of biomedical informatics, as opposed to related disciplines, lies in the modelling of the biomedical content. Interdisciplinarity also has consequences for education. Maintaining rigid disciplinary structures does not allow for sufficient adaptability to capitalize on important trends nor to leverage the influences these trends may have on biomedical informatics. It is therefore important for students to become aware of research findings in related disciplines. In this respect, it was also noted that the fact that many scientific fields use different languages and that the research findings are stored in separate bibliographic databases makes it possible that potentially connected findings will never be linked, despite the fact that these findings were published. Bridges between the sciences are needed for the success of biomedical informatics.
背景:生物医学信息学是一门广泛的学科,它借鉴了许多其他学科的方法和技术。 目的:a) 思考生物医学信息学的特点,确定它是多学科还是跨学科;b) 思考生物医学信息学是否不仅仅是其支撑学科的总和这一问题;c) 思考生物医学信息学相对于相关学科的地位。 方法:在《医学信息方法》创刊50周年之际,邀请国际生物医学信息学及相关学科的专家群体发表他们的观点。 结果与结论:本文包含了一些受邀专家对生物医学信息学特点的思考。大多数作者认同生物医学信息学是一个跨学科的研究领域,不同科学背景的研究人员单独或联合开展研究。生物医学信息学是一个非常广泛且仍在不断扩展的科学领域,不过它包含一个建设性的方面(设计和构建系统)。一位作者表示,与相关学科不同,生物医学信息学的本质在于对生物医学内容进行建模。跨学科性对教育也有影响。维持僵化的学科结构无法充分适应以利用重要趋势,也无法借助这些趋势对生物医学信息学可能产生的影响。因此,让学生了解相关学科的研究成果很重要。在这方面,还指出许多科学领域使用不同的语言,研究成果存储在不同的书目数据库中,这使得潜在相关的研究成果尽管已发表,却可能永远无法建立联系。生物医学信息学的成功需要搭建起学科之间的桥梁。
Methods Inf Med. 2011
Methods Inf Med. 2011
Methods Inf Med. 2008
Methods Inf Med. 2007
Methods Inf Med. 2008
Methods Inf Med. 2011
Healthcare (Basel). 2024-10-15
Yearb Med Inform. 2016-6-30
Yearb Med Inform. 2014-5-22
Healthc Inform Res. 2013-9
Int J Nanomedicine. 2012-7-24