Suppr超能文献

非手术干预治疗前膝痛的疗效:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of nonsurgical interventions for anterior knee pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

机构信息

Melbourne School of Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Sports Med. 2012 Jan 1;42(1):31-49. doi: 10.2165/11594460-000000000-00000.

Abstract

Anterior knee pain is a chronic condition that presents frequently to sports medicine clinics, and can have a long-term impact on participation in physical activity. Conceivably, effective early management may prevent chronicity and facilitate physical activity. Although a variety of nonsurgical interventions have been advocated, previous systematic reviews have consistently been unable to reach conclusions to support their use. Considering a decade has lapsed since publication of the most recent data in these reviews, it is timely to provide an updated synthesis of the literature to assist sports medicine practitioners in making informed, evidence-based decisions. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the evidence for nonsurgical interventions for anterior knee pain. A comprehensive search strategy was used to search MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Pre-CINAHL, PEDro, PubMed, SportDiscus, Web of Science, BIOSIS Previews, and the full Cochrane Library, while reference lists of included papers and previous systematic reviews were hand searched. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were randomized clinical trials that used a measure of pain to evaluate at least one nonsurgical intervention over at least 2 weeks in participants with anterior knee pain. A modified version of the PEDro scale was used to rate methodological quality and risk of bias. Effect size calculation and meta-analyses were based on random effects models. Of 48 suitable studies, 27 studies with low-to-moderate risk of bias were included. There was minimal opportunity for meta-analysis because of heterogeneity of interventions, comparators and follow-up times. Meta-analysis of high-quality clinical trials supports the use of a 6-week multimodal physiotherapy programme (standardized mean difference [SMD] 1.08, 95% CI 0.73, 1.43), but does not support the addition of electromyography biofeedback to an exercise programme in the short-term (4 weeks: SMD -0.21, 95% CI -0.64, 0.21; 8-12 weeks: SMD -0.22, 95% CI -0.65, 0.20). Individual study data showed beneficial effects for foot orthoses with and without multimodal physiotherapy (vs flat inserts), exercise (vs control), closed chain exercises (vs open chain exercises), patella taping in conjunction with exercise (vs exercise alone) and acupuncture (vs control). Findings suggest that, in implementing evidence-based practice for the nonsurgical management of anterior knee pain, sports medicine practitioners should prescribe local, proximal and distal components of multimodal physiotherapy in the first instance for suitable patients, and then consider foot orthoses or acupuncture as required.

摘要

前膝痛是一种常见的慢性疾病,常到运动医学诊所就诊,可能会对身体活动的参与产生长期影响。可以想象,有效的早期管理可以预防慢性疾病并促进身体活动。尽管已经提倡了多种非手术干预措施,但以前的系统评价一直无法得出支持其使用的结论。考虑到自这些综述中最新数据发布以来已经过去了十年,因此及时提供文献的最新综合信息将有助于运动医学医生做出明智、基于证据的决策。

我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估非手术干预前膝痛的证据。我们使用全面的搜索策略在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 Pre-CINAHL、PEDro、PubMed、SportDiscus、Web of Science、BIOSIS Previews 和完整的 Cochrane 图书馆中进行了搜索,同时还手动搜索了纳入论文和以前系统评价的参考文献列表。

如果研究是随机临床试验,使用疼痛测量方法评估至少 2 周内前膝痛参与者的至少一种非手术干预措施,则研究符合纳入标准。我们使用改良的 PEDro 量表对方法学质量和偏倚风险进行评分。基于随机效应模型进行效果大小计算和荟萃分析。

在 48 项合适的研究中,有 27 项研究具有低至中度偏倚风险。由于干预措施、对照和随访时间的异质性,进行荟萃分析的机会很少。高质量临床试验的荟萃分析支持使用 6 周多模式物理治疗方案(标准化均数差 [SMD] 1.08,95%CI 0.73,1.43),但不支持在短期内将肌电图生物反馈添加到运动方案中(4 周:SMD -0.21,95%CI -0.64,0.21;8-12 周:SMD -0.22,95%CI -0.65,0.20)。个别研究数据表明,足矫形器联合多模式物理治疗(与平垫相比)、运动(与对照组相比)、闭链运动(与开链运动相比)、髌骨贴扎结合运动(与单独运动相比)和针灸(与对照组相比)对前膝痛有有益的效果。

这些结果表明,在为前膝痛的非手术管理实施基于证据的实践时,运动医学医生应首先为合适的患者开具多模式物理治疗的局部、近端和远端治疗方案,然后根据需要考虑使用足矫形器或针灸。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验