Suppr超能文献

非桥接外固定与不稳定桡骨远端骨折髓内固定的随机对照研究。

Randomised study of non-bridging external fixation compared with intramedullary fixation of unstable distal radial fractures.

作者信息

Schønnemann Jesper O, Hansen Torben B, Søballe Kjeld

机构信息

Orthopedic Research Unit, Hospital Unit West, Holstebro.

出版信息

J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2011 Sep;45(4-5):232-7. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2011.613243.

Abstract

This is a randomised study to compare two types of osteosynthesis to mobilise wrists after distal fractures of the radius. Inclusion criteria were Older type 2 and 3 fractures. External fixation was managed with Hoffmann II compact non-bridging. Internal fixation was managed with Micronail. Patients were followed up for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the results of the disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire. The secondary outcomes were answers to the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE), grip strength, satisfaction, radial length, and volar tilt. Thirty patients were randomised to have external fixation and 31 to have internal fixation.There were no significant differences in DASH score. Internal fixation gave significantly better grip strength at five (p = 0.00) and 12 weeks (p = 0.03). The operating time was significantly shorter (p = 0.00) when non-bridging external fixation was used, and there were minor radiological differences. An activity-based costing analysis showed that external fixation cost three times more overall.

摘要

这是一项随机研究,旨在比较两种用于桡骨远端骨折后手腕活动的骨固定方法。纳入标准为陈旧性2型和3型骨折。外固定采用霍夫曼II型紧凑非桥接固定。内固定采用Micronail。对患者进行了12周的随访。主要结局指标是上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)问卷的结果。次要结局指标是患者自评手腕评估(PRWE)的回答、握力、满意度、桡骨长度和掌倾角。30例患者被随机分配接受外固定,31例接受内固定。DASH评分无显著差异。内固定在5周(p = 0.00)和12周(p = 0.03)时握力明显更好。使用非桥接外固定时手术时间明显更短(p = 0.00),且在影像学上有微小差异。基于活动的成本分析表明,外固定总体成本高出三倍。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验