Schønnemann Jesper O, Hansen Torben B, Søballe Kjeld
Orthopedic Research Unit, Hospital Unit West, Holstebro.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2011 Sep;45(4-5):232-7. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2011.613243.
This is a randomised study to compare two types of osteosynthesis to mobilise wrists after distal fractures of the radius. Inclusion criteria were Older type 2 and 3 fractures. External fixation was managed with Hoffmann II compact non-bridging. Internal fixation was managed with Micronail. Patients were followed up for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the results of the disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire. The secondary outcomes were answers to the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE), grip strength, satisfaction, radial length, and volar tilt. Thirty patients were randomised to have external fixation and 31 to have internal fixation.There were no significant differences in DASH score. Internal fixation gave significantly better grip strength at five (p = 0.00) and 12 weeks (p = 0.03). The operating time was significantly shorter (p = 0.00) when non-bridging external fixation was used, and there were minor radiological differences. An activity-based costing analysis showed that external fixation cost three times more overall.
这是一项随机研究,旨在比较两种用于桡骨远端骨折后手腕活动的骨固定方法。纳入标准为陈旧性2型和3型骨折。外固定采用霍夫曼II型紧凑非桥接固定。内固定采用Micronail。对患者进行了12周的随访。主要结局指标是上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)问卷的结果。次要结局指标是患者自评手腕评估(PRWE)的回答、握力、满意度、桡骨长度和掌倾角。30例患者被随机分配接受外固定,31例接受内固定。DASH评分无显著差异。内固定在5周(p = 0.00)和12周(p = 0.03)时握力明显更好。使用非桥接外固定时手术时间明显更短(p = 0.00),且在影像学上有微小差异。基于活动的成本分析表明,外固定总体成本高出三倍。