Carruthers Glenn
Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Australia.
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2012;17(4):291-314. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2011.627275. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
The sense of agency over thoughts is the experience of oneself qua agent of mental action. Those suffering certain psychotic symptoms are thought to have a deficient sense of agency. Here I seek to explain this sense of agency in terms of metacognition.
I start with the proposal that the sense of agency is elicited by metacognitive monitoring representations that are used in the intentional inhibition of thoughts. I apply this model to verbal hallucinations and the like and examine the plausibility of this model explaining deficits associated with these symptoms.
By tying the sense of agency to metacognitive inhibition I propose that the loss of a sense of agency in certain psychotic symptoms is accompanied by a particular deficit in the patient's ability to control their own thinking. This is consistent with the experiences of those at high risk of developing hallucinations, who report more intrusive thoughts than controls. The model I present is able to explain why those at risk of developing verbal hallucinations and those suffering from verbal hallucinations have deficits in the intentional inhibition of thought. I defend this account from a possible objection by distinguishing the form of the intentional inhibition deficit displayed by those suffering verbal hallucination from that displayed by those suffering from orbital-frontal cortex lesions and posttraumatic stress disorder.
A plausible hypothesis is that the sense of agency over thoughts is elicited by the metacognitive monitoring representation used to intentionally inhibit thoughts. The deficit in the sense of agency over thoughts associated with certain psychotic symptoms could be explained by a failure to properly metacognitively monitor certain thought processes.
对思维的能动感是将自己体验为心理活动的主体。那些患有某些精神症状的人被认为有能动感缺陷。在此,我试图从元认知的角度来解释这种能动感。
我首先提出,能动感是由用于有意抑制思维的元认知监测表征引发的。我将此模型应用于言语性幻听等情况,并检验该模型解释与这些症状相关缺陷的合理性。
通过将能动感与元认知抑制联系起来,我提出在某些精神症状中能动感的丧失伴随着患者控制自身思维能力的特定缺陷。这与那些有幻听高风险的人的经历一致,他们报告的侵入性思维比对照组更多。我提出的模型能够解释为什么有言语性幻听风险的人和患有言语性幻听的人在有意抑制思维方面存在缺陷。我通过区分患有言语性幻听的人所表现出的有意抑制缺陷形式与患有眶额皮质损伤和创伤后应激障碍的人所表现出的形式,来回应一个可能的反对意见,从而捍卫这一观点。
一个合理的假设是,对思维的能动感是由用于有意抑制思维的元认知监测表征引发的。与某些精神症状相关的对思维的能动感缺陷可以通过未能对某些思维过程进行适当的元认知监测来解释。