Suppr超能文献

鞘内治疗疼痛的成本效益。

Cost effectiveness of intrathecal therapy for pain.

机构信息

Pain Relief Center Goeppingen, Göppingen, Germany; University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA; Pain Unit, Hospital Universitario, Clinica Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Neuromodulation. 1999 Apr;2(2):77-87. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1403.1999.00077.x.

Abstract

Successful management of chronic cancer and nonmalignant pain remains a challenge to clinicians, and cost effectiveness is an important consideration for clinical decision making. Although the oral route was previously considered the optimal method of chronic opioid administration, emerging evidence demonstrates a therapeutic advantage to intrathecal opioid delivery compared to alternative modalities. Intrathecal drug delivery uses an implantable drug infusion system to deliver very low doses of opioids and other analgesics directly into the intrathecal space. Although the initial costs of surgical implantation of an intrathecal pump appear to be substantial, maintenance costs of intrathecal drug delivery over time are significantly lower than other routes of administration, including oral and intravenous drug delivery. Cost analyses of alternate routes of opioid administration indicate that intrathecal delivery is the most cost-effective route of opioid administration for patients who require long-term management of cancer (≥ 3-6 months) or nonmalignant pain (≥ 11-22 months).

摘要

成功管理慢性癌症和非恶性疼痛仍然是临床医生面临的挑战,成本效益是临床决策的一个重要考虑因素。虽然口服途径以前被认为是慢性阿片类药物给药的最佳方法,但新出现的证据表明,与其他方式相比,鞘内阿片类药物给药具有治疗优势。鞘内药物输送使用可植入药物输注系统将非常低剂量的阿片类药物和其他镇痛药直接输送到鞘内空间。尽管鞘内泵的手术植入初始成本似乎很高,但随着时间的推移,鞘内药物输送的维护成本明显低于其他给药途径,包括口服和静脉内药物输送。对替代阿片类药物给药途径的成本分析表明,对于需要长期管理癌症(≥3-6 个月)或非恶性疼痛(≥11-22 个月)的患者,鞘内给药是最具成本效益的阿片类药物给药途径。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验