• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智力障碍者的居家安置:影响法庭判决的因素

Residential placement of individuals with mental retardation: factors influencing court decisions.

作者信息

Gilman B, Spangler P F, Meadows S

机构信息

Office of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, Philadelphia, PA 19107.

出版信息

Ment Retard. 1990 Aug;28(4):241-4.

PMID:2215245
Abstract

Pennsylvania law mandates that involuntary commitment of persons with mental retardation be reviewed by the court system in order to assure due process. Fifty such cases in Philadelphia were reviewed in court over a period of one year and subsequently examined to determine current court trends toward institutional placement. Factors evaluated included characteristics of the individual, the presiding court, the impact of a court-appointed Child Advocate or Public Defender, and availability of residential alternatives. Results indicate that children were committed to institutional settings less frequently than adults. Other critical factors were prior placement, recommendations of advocates, and availability of alternative services.

摘要

宾夕法尼亚州法律规定,为确保正当程序,智障人士的非自愿入院须由法院系统进行审查。在一年时间里,费城有50起此类案件在法庭上接受了审查,随后进行了调查,以确定当前法院对机构安置的倾向。评估的因素包括个人特征、主审法院、法院指定的儿童辩护人或公设辩护人的影响,以及其他居住选择的可用性。结果表明,儿童被安置到机构环境中的频率低于成年人。其他关键因素是先前的安置情况、辩护人的建议以及替代服务的可用性。

相似文献

1
Residential placement of individuals with mental retardation: factors influencing court decisions.智力障碍者的居家安置:影响法庭判决的因素
Ment Retard. 1990 Aug;28(4):241-4.
2
Individual and family factors associated with risk of institutionalization of mentally retarded adults.与成年智障者机构收容风险相关的个人及家庭因素。
Am J Ment Defic. 1985 Nov;90(3):271-6.
3
Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil rights of institutionalized mentally disabled persons: hopeless oxymoron or path to redemption?治疗法理学与被收容的精神残疾人的民权:是无望的矛盾修辞还是救赎之路?
Psychol Public Policy Law. 1995 Mar;1(1):80-119.
4
Client characteristics and residential placement patterns.客户特征与居住安置模式。
Am J Ment Defic. 1987 Jul;92(1):24-30.
5
Attitudes of parents of institutionalized mentally retarded individuals toward deinstitutionalization.
Am J Ment Defic. 1980 Sep;85(2):184-7.
6
Trends in maladaptive behavior of mentally retarded persons placed in community and institutional settings.安置在社区和机构环境中的智障人士的适应不良行为趋势。
Am J Ment Defic. 1981 Mar;85(5):473-7.
7
Screening services in civil commitment of the mentally ill: an attempt to balance individual liberties with needs for treatment.对精神病患者民事强制住院的筛查服务:平衡个人自由与治疗需求的尝试。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1993;21(2):195-211.
8
Counter-habilitative contingencies in institutions for people with mental retardation: ecological and regulatory influences.智障人士机构中的反适应性意外情况:生态与管理影响
Ment Retard. 1990 Apr;28(2):67-75.
9
Predictors of out-of-home placement of children with severe handicaps: a cross-sectional analysis.
Am J Ment Retard. 1990 Mar;94(5):522-31.
10
Family, community residence, and institutional placements of a sample of mentally retarded children.一组智障儿童的家庭、社区住所及机构安置情况。
Am J Ment Defic. 1984 Nov;89(3):257-66.