State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology in Arid Areas, College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China.
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2012 Feb;51:81-9. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.10.014. Epub 2011 Oct 30.
We compared two apple rootstocks -Malus prunifolia and Malus hupehensis - that differ in their tolerance to this abiotic stress. The former is considered drought-tolerant, the latter, sensitive. We monitored changes in their leaf ultrastructure and responses by their antioxidant defense systems. Irrigation was withheld for 12 d from two-year-old potted plants. Compared with the control, this treatment led to considerable ultrastructural alterations in organelles. Plants of M. prunifolia maintained their structural cell integrity longer than did M. hupehensis. M. hupehensis was more vulnerable to drought than was M. prunifolia, resulting in larger increases in the levels of H(2)O(2), O(2)(-), and MDA from the former. Except for catalase (CAT) and monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR), the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), glutathione reductase (GR), and dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) analyzed here were enhanced to a greater extent in M. prunifolia than in M. hupehensis in response to drought. This was also true for levels of ascorbic acid (AsA) and glutathione (GSH). Under well-watered conditions, changes in lipid peroxidation and relevant antioxidant parameters were not significantly different between the two species throughout the experimental period. These results demonstrate that, in order to minimize oxidative damage, both the activities of antioxidant enzymes and antioxidant concentrations are increased in the leaves of M. prunifolia and M. hupehensis in response to water stress. Moreover, plants of M. prunifolia exhibit higher antioxidant capacity and a stronger protective mechanism, such that their cell structural integrity is better maintained during exposure to drought.
我们比较了两种苹果砧木——山定子和三叶海棠,它们在耐受这种非生物胁迫方面存在差异。前者被认为是耐旱的,后者则是敏感的。我们监测了它们叶片超微结构的变化和抗氧化防御系统的反应。从两年生盆栽植物开始,连续 12 天不浇水。与对照相比,这种处理导致了器官超微结构的显著改变。山定子比三叶海棠更能维持结构细胞的完整性。三叶海棠比山定子更容易受到干旱的影响,导致前者 H2O2、O2(-)和 MDA 的水平增加更大。除了过氧化氢酶(CAT)和单脱氢抗坏血酸还原酶(MDHAR)外,这里分析的超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化物酶(POD)、抗坏血酸过氧化物酶(APX)、谷胱甘肽还原酶(GR)和脱氢抗坏血酸还原酶(DHAR)的活性在山定子中比在三叶海棠中增强得更多,以响应干旱。抗坏血酸(AsA)和谷胱甘肽(GSH)的水平也是如此。在充分浇水的条件下,在整个实验期间,两种物种的脂质过氧化和相关抗氧化参数的变化没有显著差异。这些结果表明,为了最小化氧化损伤,山定子和三叶海棠叶片中的抗氧化酶活性和抗氧化浓度都会在水分胁迫下增加。此外,山定子植物表现出更高的抗氧化能力和更强的保护机制,使其在暴露于干旱时更好地维持细胞结构的完整性。