Nathan Niraj R, Donahue Sean P
Department of Ophthalmology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
J AAPOS. 2011 Dec;15(6):551-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.08.008.
To determine the impact of using several different proposed sets of referral criteria on the specificity and sensitivity of the plusoptiX S08 photoscreener for detecting amblyopia risk factors.
During a 2-month period, 144 children ages 9 months to 14 years were screened at the Tennessee Lions Eye Center before receiving a comprehensive eye examination and cycloplegic refraction. Three previously published sets of referral criteria were used for screening, including the manufacturer's criteria and the criteria proposed by Arthur and colleagues, which are nearly identical to the gold standard examination failure thresholds proposed by the Vision Screening Committee of the American Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS). Modifications of these criteria also were evaluated. The screening results obtained by the plusoptiX S08 were compared with the results from the gold standard pediatric ophthalmologic examination, and the respective sensitivities and specificities of each set of referral criteria in detecting amblyopia risk factors identified by the AAPOS Vision Screening Committee were calculated.
The manufacturer's criteria yielded high sensitivity (100%) but very low specificity (37%). The Arthur criteria, which used the values for the AAPOS-defined amblyopia risk factors as referral criteria, maintained sensitivity (89%) and greatly improved specificity (76%). Two modifications of the Arthur criteria further increased specificity with minimal loss of sensitivity.
The manufacturer's criteria have excellent sensitivity but low specificity, warranting modification; other criteria increase specificity with minimal effect on sensitivity.
确定使用几种不同的推荐标准对plusoptiX S08照片筛选仪检测弱视危险因素的特异性和敏感性的影响。
在2个月的时间里,144名年龄在9个月至14岁的儿童在田纳西狮子眼科中心接受了全面眼科检查和睫状肌麻痹验光之前进行了筛查。使用了三组先前发表的推荐标准进行筛查,包括制造商的标准以及亚瑟及其同事提出的标准,这些标准与美国小儿眼科与斜视协会(AAPOS)视力筛查委员会提出的金标准检查失败阈值几乎相同。还评估了这些标准的修改版本。将plusoptiX S08获得的筛查结果与金标准小儿眼科检查的结果进行比较,并计算每组推荐标准在检测AAPOS视力筛查委员会确定的弱视危险因素方面各自的敏感性和特异性。
制造商的标准具有高敏感性(100%)但特异性非常低(37%)。亚瑟标准将AAPOS定义的弱视危险因素的值用作推荐标准,保持了敏感性(89%)并大大提高了特异性(76%)。亚瑟标准的两种修改版本进一步提高了特异性,同时敏感性损失最小。
制造商的标准具有出色的敏感性但特异性较低,需要修改;其他标准在对敏感性影响最小的情况下提高了特异性。