• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童比例缩放:1/3=2/6=3/9=4/12 吗?

Child proportional scaling: is 1/3=2/6=3/9=4/12?

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Mar;111(3):516-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.11.001
PMID:22154533
Abstract

The current experiments examined the role of scale factor in children's proportional reasoning. Experiment 1 used a choice task and Experiment 2 used a production task to examine the abilities of kindergartners through fourth-graders to match equivalent, visually depicted proportional relations. The findings of both experiments show that accuracy decreased as the scaling magnitude between the equivalent proportions increased. In addition, children's errors showed that the cost of scaling proportional relations is symmetrical for problems that involve scaling up and scaling down. These findings indicate that scaling has a cognitive cost that results in decreasing performance with increasing scaling magnitude. These scale factor effects are consistent with children's use of intuitive strategies to solve proportional reasoning problems that may be important in scaffolding more formal mathematical understanding of proportional relations.

摘要

当前的实验研究了比例因子在儿童比例推理中的作用。实验 1 使用选择任务,实验 2 使用生成任务,考察了幼儿园至四年级儿童匹配等价的视觉呈现比例关系的能力。两项实验的结果均表明,随着等价比例之间的缩放幅度增加,准确性降低。此外,儿童的错误表明,缩放比例关系的成本对于涉及放大和缩小的问题是对称的。这些发现表明,缩放具有认知成本,随着缩放幅度的增加,表现会下降。这些比例因子效应与儿童使用直观策略来解决比例推理问题是一致的,这可能对支撑更正式的比例关系数学理解的脚手架很重要。

相似文献

1
Child proportional scaling: is 1/3=2/6=3/9=4/12?儿童比例缩放:1/3=2/6=3/9=4/12 吗?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Mar;111(3):516-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Dec 10.
2
Achieving a new dimension: children integrate three stimulus dimensions in volume estimations.
Dev Psychol. 2009 May;45(3):877-83. doi: 10.1037/a0014616.
3
Children's intuitive mathematics: the development of knowledge about nonlinear growth.
Child Dev. 2007 Jan-Feb;78(1):296-308. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00998.x.
4
The development of children's understanding of proportions.
Child Dev. 1975 Mar;46(1):141-8.
5
Children's understanding of posterior probability.儿童对后验概率的理解。
Cognition. 2008 Jan;106(1):325-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.005. Epub 2007 Mar 27.
6
Cognitive processes of numerical estimation in children.儿童数值估计的认知过程。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Feb;111(2):246-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
7
The relation between spatial thinking and proportional reasoning in preschoolers.学龄前儿童空间思维与比例推理之间的关系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Apr;132:213-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
8
Misconceptions about motion: development and training effects.
Child Dev. 1990 Oct;61(5):1544-57.
9
Effects of road traffic noise and irrelevant speech on children's reading and mathematical performance.道路交通噪音和无关言语对儿童阅读及数学成绩的影响。
Noise Health. 2009 Oct-Dec;11(45):194-8. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.56212.
10
Children's understanding of addition and subtraction concepts.儿童对加减法概念的理解。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Aug;103(4):532-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.12.002. Epub 2009 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Scaling up = scaling down? Children's spatial scaling in different perceptual modalities and scaling directions.扩大规模=缩小规模?儿童在不同感知模式和缩放方向上的空间缩放。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Oct 4;8(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00517-7.
2
Out of proportion or out of context? Comparing 8- to 9-year-olds' proportional reasoning abilities across fair-sharing, mixtures, and probability contexts.不成比例还是脱离情境?比较8至9岁儿童在公平分配、混合物和概率情境中的比例推理能力。
Educ Stud Math. 2023;113(3):371-388. doi: 10.1007/s10649-023-10212-5. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
3
Proportional Reasoning Deficit in Dyslexia.
阅读障碍中的比例推理缺陷
Brain Sci. 2023 May 12;13(5):795. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13050795.
4
Adults' spatial scaling from memory: Comparing the visual and haptic domain.成人的空间记忆缩放:比较视觉和触觉领域。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Aug;50(6):1201-1214. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01327-w. Epub 2022 May 24.
5
Non-symbolic Ratio Reasoning in Kindergarteners: Underlying Unidimensional Heuristics and Relations With Math Abilities.幼儿园儿童的非符号比例推理:潜在的单维启发式方法及其与数学能力的关系。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 11;13:800977. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.800977. eCollection 2022.
6
Visually Scaling Distance from Memory: Do Visible Midline Boundaries Make a Difference?凭记忆直观缩放距离:可见的中线边界会产生影响吗?
Spat Cogn Comput. 2020;20(2):134-159. doi: 10.1080/13875868.2020.1734601. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
7
Adults' spatial scaling: evidence from the haptic domain.成人的空间缩放:来自触觉领域的证据。
Cogn Process. 2019 Nov;20(4):431-440. doi: 10.1007/s10339-019-00920-3. Epub 2019 May 3.
8
A Matter of Balance: Motor Control is Related to Children's Spatial and Proportional Reasoning Skills.平衡问题:运动控制与儿童的空间和比例推理能力相关。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 12;6:2049. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02049. eCollection 2015.
9
Non-symbolic division in childhood.儿童期的非符号除法
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Feb;142:66-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.015. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
10
Non-symbolic halving in an Amazonian indigene group.亚马逊原住民群体中的非象征性减半。
Dev Sci. 2013 May;16(3):451-62. doi: 10.1111/desc.12037.