Suppr超能文献

一项针对初产妇、经产妇以及绝经前后妇女盆腔支持变化的前瞻性队列研究。

A prospective cohort study of pelvic support changes among nulliparous, multiparous, and pre- and post-menopausal women.

机构信息

Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Feb;160(2):232-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.11.016. Epub 2011 Dec 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE(S): To evaluate whether vaginal delivery affects maternal pelvic support beyond the puerperium by comparing pelvic support changes between nulliparas and multiparas, and whether menopause predisposes women to develop prolapse that protrudes beyond the hymen by comparing its occurrence between pre- and post-menopausal subjects.

STUDY DESIGN

Women who presented to our gynecology clinic for routine care and returned for follow-up after 36 ± 3 months were evaluated for pelvic support changes using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification, which measured changes in 1-cm increments. Exclusion criteria were women who were seen in the urogynecology clinic or had hysterectomy, vaginal repair, continence procedure, childbirth during the study period, or radiation therapy.

RESULTS

The proportion that experienced a 1-cm (21/101 vs. 27/164, p=0.374) and at least a 2-cm (5/101 vs. 9/164, p=0.849) descent of the leading edge of prolapse was similar between our 101 nulliparous and 164 multiparous subjects. At the initial examination, nine multiparas and one nullipara had prolapse outside the hymen (9/164 vs. 1/101, p=0.056). The proportion that developed pelvic support defect, which protruded beyond the hymen, was similar between the two groups (1/100 vs. 5/155, p=0.243). Eighty-five of our 265 subjects were post-menopausal while 180 were pre-menopausal. The proportions that developed a 1-cm (18/85 vs. 30/180, p=0.374) and at least a 2-cm (7/85 vs. 7/180, p=0.140) descent of the leading edge of prolapse were similar between the two groups. Eight post-menopausal and two pre-menopausal women had prolapse outside the hymen at the initial examination (8/85 vs. 2/180, p=0.002). More post-menopausal subjects developed support defect, which protruded beyond the hymen, than their pre-menopausal counterparts (5/77 vs. 1/178, p=0.010). Logistic regression showed that menopause (p=0.019) is an independent risk factor for developing prolapse which protruded outside the hymen, while parity (p=0.168) and interaction between menopause and parity (p=0.606) are not significantly associated with its occurrence.

CONCLUSION(S): Vaginal birth has little effect on the pelvic support changes beyond the puerperium while menopause predisposes women to prolapse their pelvic organ outside the hymen.

摘要

目的

通过比较初产妇和经产妇的盆腔支持变化,评估阴道分娩是否会对产后的盆腔支持产生影响;通过比较绝经前和绝经后女性中发生的脱垂,评估绝经是否会导致盆腔器官脱垂超出处女膜。

研究设计

对因常规就诊并在 36±3 个月后返回进行随访的女性使用盆腔器官脱垂量化(Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification)评估盆腔支持变化,该测量以 1cm 为增量。排除标准为在泌尿科就诊或在研究期间行子宫切除术、阴道修复术、控尿手术、分娩或放疗的女性。

结果

在我们的 101 名初产妇和 164 名经产妇中,经历前位脱垂前缘 1cm(21/101 比 27/164,p=0.374)和至少 2cm 下降(5/101 比 9/164,p=0.849)的比例相似。在初始检查时,9 名经产妇和 1 名初产妇的脱垂超出处女膜(9/164 比 1/101,p=0.056)。两组中,超出处女膜的盆腔支持缺陷的发展比例相似(1/100 比 5/155,p=0.243)。我们的 265 名受试者中,85 名绝经后,180 名绝经前。两组中经历前位脱垂前缘 1cm(18/85 比 30/180,p=0.374)和至少 2cm 下降(7/85 比 7/180,p=0.140)的比例相似。在初始检查时,8 名绝经后和 2 名绝经前女性的脱垂超出处女膜(8/85 比 2/180,p=0.002)。与绝经前女性相比,更多的绝经后女性发生了超出处女膜的支持缺陷(5/77 比 1/178,p=0.010)。逻辑回归显示,绝经(p=0.019)是脱垂超出处女膜的独立危险因素,而产次(p=0.168)和绝经与产次之间的相互作用(p=0.606)与脱垂的发生无显著相关性。

结论

阴道分娩对产后盆腔支持变化影响较小,而绝经使女性更容易发生超出处女膜的盆腔器官脱垂。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验