Department of Community Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506-9190, United States.
Clin Nutr. 2012 Apr;31(2):156-67. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.11.011. Epub 2011 Dec 10.
Given that previous studies have reached conflicting conclusions regarding the effects of diet (D), aerobic exercise (E) or both (DE) on blood lipid and lipoprotein concentrations in adults, the meta-analytic approach was used to address this issue.
Nine electronic databases, cross-referencing, and expert review.
Randomized controlled trials ≥ 4 weeks that included a D, E, DE and control (C) group in adults ≥ 18 years of age and in which data for one or more of the following were available: total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TG).
Dual data extraction by the first two authors.
Random-effects models as well as mixed-effects models for between-group differences.
Seven-hundred and eighty-eight men and women from 6 studies were included. Non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals were observed for D and DE with respect to lowering TC, LDL-C and TG while reductions in E were limited to TG. No significant changes in HDL-C were observed. When compared to E, reductions in TC and LDL-C were greater for D and DE (p < 0.05 for all).
Diet, especially DE, are superior to E for improving selected lipids and lipoproteins in adults.
鉴于先前的研究对于饮食(D)、有氧运动(E)或两者(DE)对成年人血脂和脂蛋白浓度的影响得出了相互矛盾的结论,因此采用荟萃分析方法来解决这个问题。
9 个电子数据库、交叉引用和专家审查。
≥4 周的随机对照试验,纳入了≥18 岁的成年人的 D、E、DE 和对照组(C),并且有以下一项或多项数据:总胆固醇(TC)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、甘油三酯(TG)。
由前两名作者进行双重数据提取。
使用随机效应模型和混合效应模型进行组间差异分析。
共有 6 项研究的 788 名男性和女性被纳入研究。在降低 TC、LDL-C 和 TG 方面,D 和 DE 观察到非重叠的 95%置信区间,而 E 对 TG 的降低作用有限。HDL-C 没有明显变化。与 E 相比,D 和 DE 在降低 TC 和 LDL-C 方面更有优势(所有 p<0.05)。
饮食,尤其是 DE,在改善成年人的某些血脂和脂蛋白方面优于 E。