Adeniran Adebowale J, Hui Pei, Chhieng David C, Prasad Manju L, Schofield Kevin, Theoharis Constantine
Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn., USA.
Acta Cytol. 2011;55(6):570-5. doi: 10.1159/000333274. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The Bethesda 2007 Thyroid Cytology Classification defines atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) as a heterogeneous category of cases that are neither convincingly benign nor sufficiently atypical for a diagnosis of follicular neoplasm or suspicious for malignancy. At our institution, we refer to these cases as 'indeterminate' and they are further subclassified into two categories. BRAF mutation occurs in 40-60% of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). In this study, we examined cases in the AUS/FLUS category in correlation with BRAF mutation analysis and surgical pathology outcome.
Thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology specimens interpreted as 'indeterminate' were selected from our files, and available remnants of thin-layer processed specimens were used for BRAF mutation analysis. Surgical pathology reports were reviewed for the final outcomes in these patients.
Of the 84 indeterminate cases with BRAF mutation analysis, only 49 had follow-up with surgical intervention. Sixteen cases had BRAF mutation. All of the BRAF-positive cases had a final diagnosis of PTC.
The sensitivity and specificity of BRAF mutation in detecting PTC in FNA specimens with indeterminate diagnosis was 59.3 and 100%, respectively, while the positive and negative predictive values were 100 and 65.6%, respectively. The limited data supports the use of BRAF mutation analysis to predict the risk of malignancy in patients with indeterminate thyroid FNAs.
背景/目的:2007年贝塞斯达甲状腺细胞病理学分类将意义不明确的非典型病变/意义不明确的滤泡性病变(AUS/FLUS)定义为一类异质性病例,这些病例既不能令人信服地判定为良性,也不足以非典型到可诊断为滤泡性肿瘤或可疑恶性肿瘤。在我们机构,我们将这些病例称为“不确定”病例,并进一步将其细分为两类。BRAF突变发生于40%-60%的甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)中。在本研究中,我们将AUS/FLUS类病例与BRAF突变分析及手术病理结果相关联进行研究。
从我们的档案中选取解释为“不确定”的甲状腺细针穿刺(FNA)细胞病理学标本,使用薄层处理标本的可用残余物进行BRAF突变分析。回顾这些患者的手术病理报告以了解最终结果。
在84例进行BRAF突变分析的不确定病例中,只有49例接受了手术干预随访。16例存在BRAF突变。所有BRAF阳性病例最终诊断为PTC。
BRAF突变在诊断不确定的FNA标本中检测PTC的敏感性和特异性分别为59.3%和100%,而阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为100%和65.6%。有限的数据支持使用BRAF突变分析来预测甲状腺FNA结果不确定患者的恶性风险。