• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何处理关联度量:临床医生的简要指南。

How to deal with measures of association: a short guide for the clinician.

机构信息

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;33(2):98-103. doi: 10.1159/000334180. Epub 2011 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1159/000334180
PMID:22156574
Abstract

When reading medical literature as a clinician, many different measures of association are presented. To judge whether results of studies can be applied to clinical practice, it is essential to understand and to be able to interpret the measure of association reported in the article. In this paper, we will present how to deal with the most commonly used measures of association including the risk and rate difference, number needed to treat, risk and rate ratio, hazard ratio and odds ratio. By means of examples, we will discuss the different measures of association for the three main study designs used in clinical research: randomized controlled trial, observational cohort study and case-control study.

摘要

当临床医生阅读医学文献时,会呈现出许多不同的关联度量。为了判断研究结果是否可应用于临床实践,理解并能够解释文章中报告的关联度量是至关重要的。在本文中,我们将介绍如何处理最常用的关联度量,包括风险和率差、需要治疗的人数、风险和率比、风险比和优势比。通过示例,我们将讨论临床研究中使用的三种主要研究设计(随机对照试验、观察性队列研究和病例对照研究)的不同关联度量。

相似文献

1
How to deal with measures of association: a short guide for the clinician.如何处理关联度量:临床医生的简要指南。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;33(2):98-103. doi: 10.1159/000334180. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
2
Methodology, measures and the clinician.方法、措施与临床医生。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;33(2):97. doi: 10.1159/000334179. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
3
Interpretation of absolute measures of disease risk in comparative research.比较研究中疾病风险绝对指标的解读。
Fam Med. 2007 Jun;39(6):432-5.
4
Group-sequential methods for adaptive seamless phase II/III clinical trials.用于适应性无缝II/III期临床试验的序贯分组方法。
J Biopharm Stat. 2011 Jul;21(4):787-801. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2011.551335.
5
Size of treatment effects and their importance to clinical research and practice.治疗效果的大小及其对临床研究和实践的重要性。
Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Jun 1;59(11):990-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.09.014. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
6
Assessment of futility in clinical trials.临床试验中无效性的评估。
Pharm Stat. 2006 Oct-Dec;5(4):273-81. doi: 10.1002/pst.216.
7
On sample size determination in multi-armed confirmatory adaptive designs.多臂验证性适应性设计中的样本量确定
J Biopharm Stat. 2011 Jul;21(4):802-17. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2011.551336.
8
Risk factors and their identification second part: study designs for identification of risk factors.风险因素及其识别 第二部分:识别风险因素的研究设计
Diabete Metab. 1995 Jun;21(3):225-31.
9
Biostatistical applications in epidemiology.流行病学中的生物统计学应用。
Pharmacotherapy. 2011 Jan;31(1):9-22. doi: 10.1592/phco.31.1.9.
10
[Down with odds ratios: risk ratios in cohort studies and randomised clinical trials].[摒弃比值比:队列研究和随机临床试验中的风险比]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2012;156(28):A4775.

引用本文的文献

1
Complete testing coverage for the early infant diagnosis algorithm and associated factors among infants exposed to HIV, Uganda, 2017-2019.2017 - 2019年乌干达对感染艾滋病毒婴儿的早期婴儿诊断算法及相关因素进行全面检测覆盖情况
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 10;20(6):e0324338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324338. eCollection 2025.
2
Effect of low-cost kitchen with improved cookstove on birthweight of neonates in Shahjadpur, Bangladesh: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.孟加拉国沙贾德布尔地区配备改良炉灶的低成本厨房对新生儿出生体重的影响:一项整群随机对照试验
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2024 Jan 3;25:100342. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100342. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Sex-Related Differences in Mortality, Delayed Cerebral Ischemia, and Functional Outcomes in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者死亡率、迟发性脑缺血及功能预后的性别差异:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2024 May 9;13(10):2781. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102781.
4
Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for In-Stent Restenosis Versus De Novo Lesions: A Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架内再狭窄与新发病变的结果:一项荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jul 4;12(13):e029300. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.029300. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
5
Risk and protective factors for self-harm and suicide in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.儿童和青少年自残和自杀的风险和保护因素:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 25;12(11):e058297. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058297.
6
Preprocedural muscle strength and physical performance and the association with functional decline or mortality in frail older patients after transcatheter aortic valve implementation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后虚弱老年患者术前肌肉力量和身体机能与功能下降或死亡的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Age Ageing. 2022 Sep 2;51(9). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac211.
7
Effects of early medication treatment and metformin use for cancer prevention in diabetes patients: a nationwide sample cohort study in Korea using extended landmark time analysis.早期药物治疗和二甲双胍用于预防糖尿病患者癌症的效果:使用扩展 landmark 时间分析的韩国全国样本队列研究。
Epidemiol Health. 2021;43:e2021103. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2021103. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
8
Novel statistical approaches to identify risk factors for soil-transmitted helminth infection in Timor-Leste.探索东帝汶土壤传播性蠕虫感染风险因素的新统计方法。
Int J Parasitol. 2021 Aug;51(9):729-739. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
9
Statistical fundamentals on cancer research for clinicians: Working with your statisticians.临床医生癌症研究的统计学基础:与统计学家合作。
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jan 16;27:75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.006. eCollection 2021 Mar.
10
Application of a Simple Parkinson's Disease Risk Score in a Longitudinal Population-Based Cohort.应用简单的帕金森病风险评分在纵向人群队列研究中。
Mov Disord. 2020 Sep;35(9):1658-1662. doi: 10.1002/mds.28127. Epub 2020 Jun 3.