Figus Andrea, Wade Ryckie G, Oakey Stephen, Ramakrishnan Venkat V
St Andrew's Centre for Plastic Surgery and Burns, Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.
Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Mar;70(3):301-7. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182306005.
Goal-directed fluid therapy optimizes cardiac output and flap perfusion during anesthesia. Intraoperative esophageal Doppler (ED) monitoring has been reported as more accurate and reliable, demonstrating improved surgical outcomes compared with central venous pressure and arterial catheter monitoring. A prospective study of patients undergoing free perforator (deep inferior epigastric artery perforator/anterolateral thigh) flap surgery with intraoperative ED monitoring (51 patients) or central venous pressure monitoring (53 patients) was undertaken. Fluid input included crystalloids, colloids, or blood products. Fluid output included urine, blood, or suctioned fluid. Postoperative fluid balance was calculated as fluid input - output. Fluid input between groups was not different. Fluid output was greater in the ED group (P = 0.008). The ED group showed less fluid balance (P = 0.023), less anesthetic time (P = 0.001), less hospital stay (mean 1.9 days; P = 0.147), less monitoring and flap complications (P = 0.062). ED monitoring demonstrated no monitoring complications, provides a favorable postoperative fluid balance, and may reduce flap complications and hospital stay.
目标导向液体治疗可在麻醉期间优化心输出量和皮瓣灌注。据报道,术中食管多普勒(ED)监测更准确可靠,与中心静脉压和动脉导管监测相比,手术结局有所改善。对接受游离穿支(腹壁下深动脉穿支/股前外侧)皮瓣手术的患者进行了一项前瞻性研究,术中采用ED监测(51例患者)或中心静脉压监测(53例患者)。液体输入包括晶体液、胶体液或血液制品。液体输出包括尿液、血液或吸引出的液体。术后液体平衡计算为液体输入量减去输出量。两组间液体输入无差异。ED组的液体输出量更大(P = 0.008)。ED组的液体平衡更少(P = 0.023),麻醉时间更短(P = 0.001),住院时间更短(平均1.9天;P = 0.147),监测和皮瓣并发症更少(P = 0.062)。ED监测未显示监测并发症,可提供良好的术后液体平衡,并可能减少皮瓣并发症和缩短住院时间。