Mehta Neil, Fernandez-Bustamante Ana, Seres Tamas
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12405 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:702964. doi: 10.1155/2014/702964. Epub 2014 May 27.
Increasing evidence shows that goal-directed hemodynamic management can improve outcomes in surgical and intensive care settings. Arterial waveform analysis is one of the different techniques used for guiding goal-directed therapy. Multiple proprietary systems have developed algorithms for obtaining cardiac output from an arterial waveform, including the FloTrac, LiDCO, and PiCCO systems. These systems vary in terms of how they analyze the arterial pressure waveform as well as their requirements for invasive line placement and calibration. Although small-scale clinical trials using these monitors show promising data, large-scale multicenter trials are still needed to better determine how intraoperative goal-directed therapy with arterial waveform analysis can improve patient outcomes. This review provides a comparative analysis of the different arterial waveform monitors for intraoperative goal-directed therapy.
越来越多的证据表明,目标导向的血流动力学管理可改善手术和重症监护环境中的治疗效果。动脉波形分析是用于指导目标导向治疗的不同技术之一。多个专有系统已开发出从动脉波形获取心输出量的算法,包括FloTrac、LiDCO和PiCCO系统。这些系统在分析动脉压力波形的方式以及对有创管路放置和校准的要求方面各不相同。尽管使用这些监测器的小规模临床试验显示出有前景的数据,但仍需要大规模多中心试验来更好地确定术中使用动脉波形分析的目标导向治疗如何改善患者预后。本综述对用于术中目标导向治疗的不同动脉波形监测器进行了比较分析。