• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中静脉桥血管无复流现象的滤过:发生率、预测因素和保护装置类型的影响。

Filter no-reflow during percutaneous coronary intervention of saphenous vein grafts: incidence, predictors and effect of the type of protection device.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2011 Dec;7(8):955-61. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I8A151.

DOI:10.4244/EIJV7I8A151
PMID:22157481
Abstract

AIMS

To assess the main predictors and significance of filter no-reflow (FNR) in protected saphenous vein graft (SVG) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and the effect of two different filter-based devices on FNR incidence. The phenomenon of FNR has been described as a transient impairment of blood flow due to debris plugging of a filter-based device used to shield the distal microvasculature during SVG PCI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty consecutive patients treated with SVG PCI were enrolled, using two different filter-based devices (FilterWire EZ™ [Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA] and SpiderRX® [Ev3, Plymouth, MN, USA]). We evaluated: 1) the value of clinical and angiographic variables for predicting FNR including the recently-described "degeneration score" (DS); 2) the predictive value of FNR for post-procedural (type IVa) myocardial infarction (MI); 3) the effect of filter type on incidence of FNR. FNR was observed in 30% of patients and was predicted by a higher DS at baseline (2.1±0.9 vs. 1.4±0.8, p=0.02, respectively) as well as by the type of filter used (54% vs. 23% in SpiderFX and FilterWire EZ, respectively, p=0.04). However, at multivariate analysis DS was the only independent predictor of FNR (OR 2.47, CI 95% 1.06-5.76, p=0.04). Graft age and FNR were found to be independent predictors of type IVa MI (OR 1.28; CI%E2%80%AF95% 1.01-1.64, p=0.04 and OR 15.69; CI%E2%80%AF95% 2.12-116.39, p=0.007, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

FNR is a common complication of protected SVG stenting. FNR occurs mainly in grafts with a high degeneration score, and the presence of FNR predicts post-procedural myocardial infarction.

摘要

目的

评估保护的隐静脉移植物(SVG)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中滤器无复流(FNR)的主要预测因素和意义,以及两种不同滤器装置对 FNR 发生率的影响。FNR 现象描述为在 SVG PCI 期间使用滤器装置屏蔽远端微血管时,由于碎片堵塞滤器装置而导致的血流短暂受损。

方法和结果

连续入组 50 例接受 SVG PCI 治疗的患者,使用两种不同的滤器装置(FilterWire EZ[波士顿科学公司,马萨诸塞州纳蒂克]和 SpiderRX[Ev3,明尼苏达州普利茅斯])。我们评估了:1)预测 FNR 的临床和血管造影变量的价值,包括最近描述的“退化评分”(DS);2)FNR 对术后(IVa 型)心肌梗死(MI)的预测价值;3)滤器类型对 FNR 发生率的影响。30%的患者出现 FNR,其预测因素为基线时较高的 DS(2.1±0.9 与 1.4±0.8,p=0.02)以及使用的滤器类型(SpiderFX 和 FilterWire EZ 分别为 54%和 23%,p=0.04)。然而,多变量分析显示 DS 是 FNR 的唯一独立预测因素(OR 2.47,95%CI 1.06-5.76,p=0.04)。移植物年龄和 FNR 被发现是 IVa 型 MI 的独立预测因素(OR 1.28;95%CI 1.01-1.64,p=0.04 和 OR 15.69;95%CI 2.12-116.39,p=0.007,分别)。

结论

FNR 是保护的 SVG 支架置入术的常见并发症。FNR 主要发生在高退化评分的移植物中,FNR 的存在预测术后心肌梗死。

相似文献

1
Filter no-reflow during percutaneous coronary intervention of saphenous vein grafts: incidence, predictors and effect of the type of protection device.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中静脉桥血管无复流现象的滤过:发生率、预测因素和保护装置类型的影响。
EuroIntervention. 2011 Dec;7(8):955-61. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I8A151.
2
Filter no reflow during percutaneous coronary interventions using the Filterwire distal protection device.
Int J Cardiol. 2006 Apr 28;109(1):53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.05.071. Epub 2005 Aug 9.
3
Initial clinical experience with distal protection using the FilterWire in patients undergoing coronary artery and saphenous vein graft percutaneous intervention.使用FilterWire进行远端保护在接受冠状动脉和隐静脉移植血管经皮介入治疗患者中的初步临床经验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002 Oct;57(2):125-34. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10313.
4
Six-month outcomes after percutaneous intervention for lesions in aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts using distal protection devices: results from the FIRE trial.
Am Heart J. 2006 Apr;151(4):915.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.09.018.
5
A novel filter-based distal embolic protection device for percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein graft lesions: results of the AMEthyst randomized controlled trial.一种用于隐静脉桥病变经皮介入治疗的新型基于滤器的远端栓塞保护装置:紫水晶随机对照试验结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Jun;1(3):248-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.03.009.
6
Embolic protection device use and outcomes in patients receiving saphenous vein graft interventions--a single-center experience.接受大隐静脉移植血管介入治疗患者的栓子保护装置使用情况及治疗结果——单中心经验
J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Jan;24(1):1-3.
7
Distal embolization during native vessel and vein graft coronary intervention with a vascular protection device: predictors of high-risk lesions.使用血管保护装置进行自身血管及静脉移植物冠状动脉介入治疗期间的远端栓塞:高危病变的预测因素
J Interv Cardiol. 2007 Dec;20(6):474-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00308.x.
8
Case-control registry of excimer laser coronary angioplasty versus distal protection devices in patients with acute coronary syndromes due to saphenous vein graft disease.急性冠状动脉综合征患者因隐静脉桥病变而行准分子激光冠状动脉血管成形术与远端保护装置的病例对照登记研究。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Nov 15;112(10):1586-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.07.015. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
9
Poor long-term patient and graft survival after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction due to saphenous vein graft occlusion.因隐静脉移植物闭塞导致急性心肌梗死患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,患者及移植物的长期生存率较低。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005 Aug;65(4):504-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20392.
10
Failure of the Symbiot PTFE-covered stent to reduce distal embolization during percutaneous coronary intervention in saphenous vein grafts.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2005 Nov;17(11):609-12.

引用本文的文献

1
Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of coronary microvascular diseases (2023 Edition).冠状动脉微血管疾病诊断与治疗中国专家共识(2023年版)
MedComm (2020). 2023 Dec 19;4(6):e438. doi: 10.1002/mco2.438. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Predictors of periprocedural complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions within coronary artery bypass grafts.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在冠状动脉旁路移植术中围手术期并发症的预测因素。
Cardiol J. 2019;26(6):633-644. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0044. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
3
Impact of thin-cap fibroatheroma on predicting deteriorated coronary flow during interventional procedures in acute as well as stable coronary syndromes: insights from optical coherence tomography analysis.
薄帽纤维粥样斑块对预测急性和稳定型冠状动脉综合征介入治疗期间冠状动脉血流恶化的影响:光学相干断层扫描分析的见解
Heart Vessels. 2015 Nov;30(6):719-27. doi: 10.1007/s00380-014-0542-3. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
4
Spontaneous and procedural plaque embolisation in native coronary arteries: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and prevention.天然冠状动脉中的自发性和程序性斑块栓塞:病理生理学、诊断和预防
Scientifica (Cairo). 2013;2013:364247. doi: 10.1155/2013/364247. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
5
Secondary revascularization after CABG surgery.CABG 手术后的二次血运重建。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2012 Sep;9(9):540-9. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2012.100. Epub 2012 Jul 10.