School of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Emerg Med J. 2013 Jan;30(1):74-5. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200528. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
To determine whether cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performance is influenced by a rescuer's preferred side of approach.
Eighty-three first-year healthcare students were enrolled in a prospective randomised crossover study comparing chest compression quality during uninterrupted chest compression CPR after approach from both their preferred and non-preferred sides.
Chest compression quality was not dependent on rescuers' sidedness preference; neither mean compression rate and depth nor hand positioning differed between sides of approach.
No link exists between the side from which a rescuer approaches, or prefers to approach, a casualty and chest compression quality.
确定心肺复苏(CPR)的表现是否受抢救者首选接近侧的影响。
83 名一年级医疗保健专业学生参加了一项前瞻性随机交叉研究,比较了从首选侧和非首选侧接近后不间断胸部按压 CPR 期间的胸部按压质量。
胸部按压质量与抢救者的侧身偏好无关;按压频率和深度的平均值以及手的位置在接近侧之间没有差异。
抢救者接近或更喜欢接近伤员的侧别与胸部按压质量之间没有联系。