• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

救援者疲劳在 2010 年 ERC 指南下,及其对心肺复苏术(CPR)表现的影响。

Rescuer fatigue under the 2010 ERC guidelines, and its effect on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performance.

机构信息

School of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, The Medical School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2013 Aug;30(8):623-7. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201610. Epub 2012 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1136/emermed-2012-201610
PMID:22851670
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Updated life-support guidelines were published by the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) in 2010, increasing the required depth and rate of chest compression delivery. This study sought to determine the impact of these guidelines on rescuer fatigue and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performance.

METHODS

62 Health science students performed 5 min of conventional CPR in accordance with the 2010 ERC guidelines. A SkillReporter manikin was used to objectively assess temporal change in determinants of CPR quality. Participants subjectively reported their end-fatigue levels, using a visual analogue scale, and the point at which they believed fatigue was affecting CPR delivery.

RESULTS

49 (79%) participants reported that fatigue affected their CPR performance, at an average of 167 s. End fatigue averaged 49.5/100 (range 0-95). The proportion of chest compressions delivered correctly decreased from 52% in min 1 to 39% in min 5, approaching significance (p=0.071). A significant decline in chest compressions reaching the recommended depth occurred between the first (53%) and fifth (38%) min (p=0.012). Almost half this decline (6%) was between the first and second minutes of CPR. Neither chest compression rate, nor rescue breath volume, were affected by rescuer fatigue.

CONCLUSION

Fatigue affects chest compression delivery within the second minute of CPR under the 2010 ERC guidelines, and is poorly judged by rescuers. Rescuers should, therefore, be encouraged to interchange after 2 min of CPR delivery. Team leaders should be advised to not rely on rescuers to self-report fatigue, and should, instead, monitor for its effects.

摘要

背景

欧洲复苏委员会(ERC)于 2010 年发布了更新的生命支持指南,增加了胸外按压的深度和频率要求。本研究旨在确定这些指南对救援者疲劳和心肺复苏(CPR)表现的影响。

方法

62 名健康科学专业学生按照 2010 年 ERC 指南进行了 5 分钟的常规 CPR。使用 SkillReporter 模拟人客观评估 CPR 质量决定因素的时间变化。参与者使用视觉模拟量表主观报告他们的终末疲劳水平,并报告他们认为疲劳开始影响 CPR 实施的时间点。

结果

49 名(79%)参与者报告疲劳影响了他们的 CPR 表现,平均时间为 167 秒。终末疲劳平均为 49.5/100(范围 0-95)。在第 5 分钟时,正确实施的胸外按压比例从第 1 分钟的 52%下降到 39%,接近显著水平(p=0.071)。在第 1 分钟(53%)和第 5 分钟(38%)之间,推荐深度的胸外按压深度显著下降(p=0.012)。这一下降的近一半(6%)发生在 CPR 的第 1 分钟和第 2 分钟之间。胸外按压频率和救援呼吸量均不受救援者疲劳的影响。

结论

在 2010 年 ERC 指南下,疲劳会影响 CPR 实施的前 2 分钟的胸外按压实施,并且救援者对此的判断很差。因此,应鼓励救援者在进行 2 分钟的 CPR 后进行轮换。团队领导应避免依赖救援者自我报告疲劳,而应监测其影响。

相似文献

1
Rescuer fatigue under the 2010 ERC guidelines, and its effect on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performance.救援者疲劳在 2010 年 ERC 指南下,及其对心肺复苏术(CPR)表现的影响。
Emerg Med J. 2013 Aug;30(8):623-7. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201610. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
2
Effect of one-rescuer compression/ventilation ratios on cardiopulmonary resuscitation in infant, pediatric, and adult manikins.单人施救者按压/通气比例对婴儿、儿童和成人模拟人进行心肺复苏的影响。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 May;6(3):293-7. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000161621.74554.15.
3
Rescuer fatigue: standard versus continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.救援者疲劳:标准胸外按压与持续胸外按压心肺复苏术对比
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;13(10):1020-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.06.049.
4
Rescuer-limited cardiopulmonary resuscitation as an alternative to 2-min switched CPR in the setting of inhospital cardiac arrest: a randomised cross-over study.在医院内心脏骤停情况下,以救援人员限制的心肺复苏替代2分钟切换式心肺复苏:一项随机交叉研究。
Emerg Med J. 2015 Jul;32(7):539-43. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203477. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
5
CPR PRO® device reduces rescuer fatigue during continuous chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized crossover trial using a manikin model.CPR PRO®设备在持续胸外按压心肺复苏过程中减轻施救者疲劳:一项使用人体模型的随机交叉试验。
J Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;45(4):570-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.04.021. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
6
Quality of chest compressions during compression-only CPR: a comparative analysis following the 2005 and 2010 American Heart Association guidelines.仅按压心肺复苏期间的胸部按压质量:2005 年和 2010 年美国心脏协会指南发布后的对比分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Jan;32(1):50-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.09.043. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
7
A different rescuer changing strategy between 30:2 cardiopulmonary resuscitation and hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation that considers rescuer factors: a randomised cross-over simulation study with a time-dependent analysis.一种考虑施救者因素的不同心肺复苏策略,即在 30:2 心肺复苏和单纯胸外按压心肺复苏之间切换:一项基于时间的随机交叉模拟研究。
Resuscitation. 2012 Mar;83(3):353-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.11.006. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
8
Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by EMS personnel and assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.胸壁减压不完全:急救医疗服务人员心肺复苏操作的临床评估及替代手动胸外按压-减压技术的评估
Resuscitation. 2005 Mar;64(3):353-62. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.10.007.
9
Rescuer fatigue in the elderly: standard vs. hands-only CPR.老年人中的救援者疲劳:标准心肺复苏与单纯胸外按压心肺复苏对比
J Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;42(1):88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.05.019. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
10
Single rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation: can anyone perform to the guidelines 2000 recommendations?单人施救者心肺复苏:任何人都能按照2000年指南建议操作吗?
Resuscitation. 2006 Oct;71(1):34-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.02.020. Epub 2006 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Compression Rotation Intervals on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.按压-旋转间隔对心肺复苏质量的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Jun 25;13(1):e58. doi: 10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2704. eCollection 2025.
2
Hand vs. leg-heel: Evaluating a viable second line approach for chest compressions to bridge the 'bystander's window'.手部按压与腿部足跟按压:评估一种可行的二线胸部按压方法以填补“旁观者反应时间”。
Resusc Plus. 2025 Feb 3;22:100891. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100891. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Mechanical chest compression increases intrathoracic hemorrhage complications in patients receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
在接受体外心肺复苏的患者中,机械胸外按压会增加胸腔内出血并发症。
Resusc Plus. 2025 Feb 3;22:100892. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100892. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Exoskeletons as potential devices to support and enhance rescuers' chest compression performance during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.外骨骼作为在院外心脏骤停期间支持和增强救援人员胸外按压性能的潜在设备。
Resusc Plus. 2025 Jan 17;22:100871. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100871. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Effects of Concurrent Training on Resuscitation and Cognitive Performance in Paramedics-A Pilot Study.同步训练对护理人员复苏及认知表现的影响——一项试点研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 12;12(16):1599. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12161599.
6
Do laypersons need App-linked real-time feedback devices for effective resuscitation? - Results of a prospective, randomised simulation trial.非专业人员是否需要应用程序连接的实时反馈设备来进行有效的心肺复苏?——一项前瞻性随机模拟试验的结果
Resusc Plus. 2024 Apr 17;18:100631. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100631. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Impact of teaching on use of mechanical chest compression devices: a simulation-based trial.教学对机械胸外按压设备使用的影响:一项基于模拟的试验。
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Feb 26;17(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00611-7.
8
Influence of high altitude after a prior ascent on physical exhaustion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised crossover alpine field experiment.高海拔环境对先前登峰后心肺复苏体能衰竭的影响:一项随机交叉高山现场实验。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 24;31(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01132-7.
9
Trained Lifeguards Performing Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation While Running: A Pilot Simulation Study.训练有素的救生员在跑步时进行儿科心肺复苏:一项试点模拟研究。
Children (Basel). 2023 Aug 4;10(8):1348. doi: 10.3390/children10081348.
10
Manual Chest Compression versus Automated Chest Compression Device during Day-Time and Night-Time Resuscitation Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Historical Control Study.院外心脏骤停后白天和夜间复苏期间手动胸外按压与自动胸外按压装置的比较:一项回顾性历史对照研究
J Pers Med. 2023 Jul 28;13(8):1202. doi: 10.3390/jpm13081202.