Suppr超能文献

对于接受左心室辅助装置植入的患者,最佳的抗生素预防措施是什么?

What is the optimum antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing implantation of a left ventricular assist device?

作者信息

Acharya Metesh Nalin, Som Robin, Tsui Steven

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Watford General Hospital, Watford, UK.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Feb;14(2):209-14. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivr054. Epub 2011 Nov 30.

Abstract

A best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was what the optimum antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is. A total of 373 papers were found, of which 11 represented the best evidence. The authors, date, journal, study type, population, main outcome measures and results are tabulated. Eight retrospective and two prospective studies, including one randomized controlled trial (RCT), were identified. Although highly variable, the prophylactic antibiotic protocols employed in these studies generally favour the use of vancomycin, a cephalosporin, beta-lactam and quinolone, with the option of additional fluconazole and mupirocin. However, the lack of standardized definitions for infection, and variations in the choice, timing and duration of prophylactic antibiotics complicates the interpretation of reported infection rates. Driveline and pocket infections comprised the majority of infectious complications, and were principally attributed to Gram-positive organisms, such as Staphylococcus, as well as Pseudomonas species. We conclude that a beta-lactam be used for primary prophylaxis, with vancomycin where the risk of MRSA is high. Topical mupirocin and an anti-fungal are also recommended. Prophylaxis should commence prior to device insertion, and be continued into the peri- and post-operative period. Large-scale RCTs are necessary to assess the impact of different antibiotic regimens on infection within LVAD recipients.

摘要

根据结构化方案撰写了一篇最佳证据主题文章。所探讨的问题是,接受左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入术的患者的最佳抗生素预防方案是什么。共检索到373篇论文,其中11篇代表最佳证据。现将作者、日期、期刊、研究类型、研究人群、主要结局指标及结果制成表格列出。确定了八项回顾性研究和两项前瞻性研究,其中包括一项随机对照试验(RCT)。尽管这些研究中采用的预防性抗生素方案差异很大,但总体上倾向于使用万古霉素、头孢菌素、β-内酰胺类和喹诺酮类药物,还可选择加用氟康唑和莫匹罗星。然而,感染缺乏标准化定义,预防性抗生素在选择、时机和疗程方面存在差异,这使得对报告的感染率的解读变得复杂。驱动线和囊袋感染占感染性并发症的大多数,主要归因于革兰氏阳性菌,如葡萄球菌以及假单胞菌属。我们得出结论,对于一级预防应使用β-内酰胺类药物,在耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)风险高的情况下使用万古霉素。还建议使用外用莫匹罗星和抗真菌药物。预防应在装置植入前开始,并持续至围手术期和术后。有必要开展大规模随机对照试验来评估不同抗生素方案对LVAD植入受者感染情况的影响。

相似文献

3
Surgical infection prophylaxis for left ventricular assist device implantation.
J Card Surg. 2011 Jul;26(4):440-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2011.01262.x. Epub 2011 May 9.
6
Left ventricular assist device driveline infections.左心室辅助装置的驱动线感染。
Cardiol Clin. 2011 Nov;29(4):515-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2011.08.004.
10
Left ventricular assist device-related infections: a multicentric study.左心室辅助装置相关感染:一项多中心研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 Oct;23(10):748-751. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

3
Non-patient factors associated with infections in LVAD recipients: A scoping review.与 LVAD 受者感染相关的非患者因素:范围综述。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Jan;41(1):1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
4
Ventricular Assist Device-Specific Infections.心室辅助装置相关感染
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 25;10(3):453. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030453.
5
In Full Flow: Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections in the Modern Era.全面解析:现代左心室辅助装置感染
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 17;7(5):ofaa124. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa124. eCollection 2020 May.
8

本文引用的文献

5
9
Left ventricular assist device-related infection: treatment and outcome.左心室辅助装置相关感染:治疗与结局
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Apr 15;40(8):1108-15. doi: 10.1086/428728. Epub 2005 Mar 11.
10
Infection in permanent circulatory support: experience from the REMATCH trial.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2004 Dec;23(12):1359-65. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2003.09.025.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验