• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

述评:关于监管、一厢情愿和否认。

Commentary: On regulation, wishfulness, and denial.

机构信息

University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21210, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(4):477-9.

PMID:22159975
Abstract

Restraint and seclusion are unsavory topics within a discipline that cherishes verbal interventions. As such, the principles of use are haphazardly taught by in-house clinicians or private agencies. Policy standards were published in the 1980s, but they have not been officially updated, despite the fact that an American Psychiatric Association (APA) committee met in 2003 to overhaul the standards of care. In training programs, violence is given little syllabus space, compared with the treatment of mood and thought disorders. Aggression remains a stepchild symptom, even though it is frequently encountered in clinical practice.

摘要

约束和隔离是一个崇尚言语干预的学科中不受欢迎的话题。因此,使用原则是由内部临床医生或私人机构随意教授的。政策标准在 20 世纪 80 年代发布,但尽管美国精神病学协会 (APA) 委员会于 2003 年开会全面审查护理标准,但它们并未得到正式更新。在培训计划中,与治疗情绪和思维障碍相比,暴力问题的教学大纲空间很小。即使在临床实践中经常遇到,攻击性仍然是一个不受重视的症状。

相似文献

1
Commentary: On regulation, wishfulness, and denial.述评:关于监管、一厢情愿和否认。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(4):477-9.
2
Commentary: Interventions based on learning principles can supplant seclusion and restraint.述评:基于学习原理的干预措施可以替代隔离和约束。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(4):480-95.
3
Restraint and seclusion in psychiatric treatment settings: regulation, case law, and risk management.精神科治疗环境中的约束和隔离:法规、案例法和风险管理。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(4):465-76.
4
Remote assessment of the use of seclusion and restraint with paediatric psychiatric patients.
J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9(3):176-9. doi: 10.1258/135763303767150003.
5
Regulatory change: a pathway to eliminating seclusion and restraint or "regulatory scotoma"?监管变革:消除隔离与约束的途径还是“监管盲区”?
Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Feb;59(2):194-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.2.194.
6
Montana state court establishes constitutional requirements for use of seclusion and restraint.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1991 Dec;42(12):1266-7.
7
Child & adolescent psychiatry : seclusion and restraint reform: an initiative by a child and adolescent psychiatric hospital.儿童与青少年精神病学:隔离与约束改革:一家儿童与青少年精神病医院的倡议
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Jul;54(7):958-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.7.958.
8
Seclusion and restraint: Congress reacts to reports of abuse.隔离与约束:国会对虐待报告做出反应。
Psychiatr Serv. 1999 Jul;50(7):881-2, 885. doi: 10.1176/ps.50.7.881.
9
Beyond emergencies: the use of physical restraints in medical and psychiatric settings.超越紧急情况:医疗和精神科环境中身体约束的使用。
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2010 Nov-Dec;18(6):353-8. doi: 10.3109/10673229.2010.527514.
10
The reasons for using restraint and seclusion in psychiatric inpatient care: A nationwide 15-year study.精神科住院护理中使用约束和隔离的原因:一项为期15年的全国性研究。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2010 Apr;64(2):136-44. doi: 10.3109/08039480903274449.