• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

述评:基于学习原理的干预措施可以替代隔离和约束。

Commentary: Interventions based on learning principles can supplant seclusion and restraint.

机构信息

Semel Institute of Neuroscience and Human Behavior, 760 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(4):480-95.

PMID:22159976
Abstract

Regulatory and administrative imperatives, when paired with staff training in humanistic, verbally mediated interventions can reduce the frequency of seclusion and restraint but can be associated with increases in the frequency and severity of staff injury, with concomitant tension and apprehension in the treatment setting. Even when educational programs for staff are made available for patient-centered, therapeutic, and persuasion-based modes of de-escalation, aggression, destructiveness and self-injury may continue to occur or even increase. Administrative contingencies can lead to less reporting of such incidents by staff with consequential, adverse effects on their morale and the unit milieu. Given the neurocognitive deficits, learning disabilities and lengthy histories of inadvertent reinforcement of provocative and aggressive behavior among persons with developmental and serious psychiatric disorders, basic principles of learning are needed to teach alternatives for belligerent behavior. Examples of behavior therapies that have been documented as effective in reducing aggression and self-injury include differential reinforcement of other behavior, social skills training, teaching interaction, social learning modalities, and time out from reinforcement. These evidence-based behavioral interventions must be superimposed on optimal, diagnostically driven, and monitored pharmacotherapy. When evidence-based, person-centered, and recovery-oriented biobehavioral interventions are made available to inpatient units, favorable clinical outcomes with reductions in the use of seclusion and restraint are likely.

摘要

监管和行政要求,当与人文关怀、口头干预的员工培训相结合时,可以减少隔离和约束的频率,但可能会导致员工受伤的频率和严重程度增加,同时在治疗环境中会产生紧张和担忧。即使为员工提供了以患者为中心、治疗和劝导为基础的缓和模式的教育计划,攻击、破坏和自残行为仍可能继续发生甚至增加。行政应急措施可能导致员工对这些事件的报告减少,从而对他们的士气和单位环境产生不利影响。鉴于具有发育和严重精神疾病的人存在神经认知缺陷、学习障碍和长期无意强化挑衅和攻击行为的历史,需要学习基本原则来教授对抗性行为的替代方法。已经记录为有效的减少攻击和自残行为的行为疗法的例子包括其他行为的差异强化、社交技能训练、教授互动、社会学习模式,以及从强化中暂停。这些基于证据的行为干预措施必须叠加在最佳的、基于诊断的、并受监测的药物治疗上。当为住院病房提供基于证据、以患者为中心和以康复为导向的生物行为干预措施时,可能会带来有利的临床结果,减少隔离和约束的使用。

相似文献

1
Commentary: Interventions based on learning principles can supplant seclusion and restraint.述评:基于学习原理的干预措施可以替代隔离和约束。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(4):480-95.
2
Commentary: On regulation, wishfulness, and denial.述评:关于监管、一厢情愿和否认。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(4):477-9.
3
Restraint and seclusion in psychiatric treatment settings: regulation, case law, and risk management.精神科治疗环境中的约束和隔离:法规、案例法和风险管理。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(4):465-76.
4
Regulatory change: a pathway to eliminating seclusion and restraint or "regulatory scotoma"?监管变革:消除隔离与约束的途径还是“监管盲区”?
Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Feb;59(2):194-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.2.194.
5
Two-year trends in the use of seclusion and restraint among psychiatrically hospitalized youths.精神病住院青少年使用隔离和约束措施的两年趋势。
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Jul;54(7):987-93. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.7.987.
6
De-escalation techniques used, and reasons for seclusion and restraint, in a forensic psychiatric hospital.使用的降级技术,以及在法医精神病院进行隔离和约束的原因。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Oct;26(5):513-524. doi: 10.1111/inm.12389.
7
Evidence base for practice: reduction of restraint and seclusion use during child and adolescent psychiatric inpatient treatment.实践的证据基础:减少儿童和青少年精神科住院治疗期间的约束和隔离使用
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2006;3(1):19-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2006.00043.x.
8
Staff perceptions and organizational factors as predictors of seclusion and restraint on psychiatric wards.工作人员的看法和组织因素是预测精神科病房禁闭和约束的因素。
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 May;62(5):484-91. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.5.pss6205_0484.
9
Effects of a Staff Training Intervention on Seclusion Rates on an Adult Inpatient Psychiatric Unit.员工培训干预对成人住院精神科病房隔离率的影响。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2018 Jun 1;56(6):23-30. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20180212-02. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
10
An Educational Intervention to Decrease the Number of Emergency Incidents of Restraint and Seclusion on a Behavioral Health Unit.一项减少行为健康病房约束和隔离紧急事件数量的教育干预。
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2022 Feb;53(2):70-76. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20220104-07. Epub 2022 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns of Restraint Utilization in a Community Hospital's Psychiatric Inpatient Units.社区医院精神科住院病房的约束使用模式
Psychiatr Q. 2016 Mar;87(1):31-48. doi: 10.1007/s11126-015-9353-7.