Office of Students with Disabilities, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1Y2, Canada.
Ann Dyslexia. 2012 Apr;62(1):22-52. doi: 10.1007/s11881-011-0060-2. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
This study investigated whether children with dyslexia differed in their performance on reading, phonological, rapid naming, motor, and cerebellar-related tasks and automaticity measures compared to reading age (RA)-matched and chronological age (CA)-matched control groups. Participants were 51 children attending mainstream English elementary schools in Quebec. All participants completed measures of IQ, word and nonword reading fluency, elision, nonword decoding, rapid naming, bead threading, peg moving, toe tapping, postural stability, and muscle tone. Results from both group contrasts and analyses at the individual case level did not provide support for claims of motor-cerebellar involvement in either typical or atypical reading acquisition. Results were more consistent with a phonological core process account of both typical reading and reading difficulty. Phonological deficits for children with dyslexia compared to RA-matched controls were, however, only evident in group contrasts. Findings thus also have important implications for identifying at-risk readers among their same-aged peers.
本研究旨在调查阅读障碍儿童在阅读、语音、快速命名、运动和与小脑相关的任务以及自动性测量方面的表现是否与阅读年龄(RA)匹配和年龄(CA)匹配的对照组存在差异。参与者为魁北克州主流英语小学的 51 名儿童。所有参与者都完成了智商、单词和非单词阅读流畅性、省略、非单词解码、快速命名、穿珠、移动别针、脚趾敲击、姿势稳定性和肌肉张力的测量。无论是组间对比还是个体案例分析的结果都没有支持运动-小脑参与典型或非典型阅读习得的说法。结果更符合典型阅读和阅读困难的语音核心过程解释。然而,与 RA 匹配的对照组相比,阅读障碍儿童的语音缺陷仅在组间对比中明显。因此,这些发现对于在同龄阅读者中识别有阅读障碍风险的儿童也具有重要意义。