Citrome Leslie, Meng Xiangyi, Hochfeld Marla, Stahl Stephen M
New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2012 Jan;27(1):24-32. doi: 10.1002/hup.1254. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
The efficacy and tolerability characteristics of an antipsychotic are difficult to determine from a single registration study. We thus conducted an analysis that assessed key efficacy and tolerability outcomes post hoc from four pooled short-term (4-6 weeks) phase III studies that evaluated iloperidone versus placebo in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.
Patient-level data were pooled from four prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled, multicenter trials of iloperidone in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder aged 18-65 years. Iloperidone 4-8, 10-16, and 20-24 mg/day (all dosed twice daily) were compared with placebo. Active controls used for assay sensitivity included risperidone 4-8 mg/day, haloperidol 15 mg/day, and ziprasidone 160 mg/day. Outcomes of interest were change from baseline to endpoint in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (derived) (BPRSd), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)-total (PANSS-T) score, and PANSS-positive (PANSS-P) and PANSS-negative (PANSS-N) subscale scores. An analysis of covariance (with treatment and study as factors, baseline as a covariate) was performed to compare changes between the iloperidone treatment groups versus placebo, on the basis of a last-observation-carried-forward approach for the intent-to-treat (ITT) populations. Tolerability outcomes were obtained from spontaneously reported adverse events (AEs), and number needed to harm was calculated for each antipsychotic versus placebo for the total population.
The ITT population included both schizoaffective and schizophrenia patients (N = 2401): n = 370, n = 494, and n = 424 for iloperidone 4-8, 10-16, and 20-24 mg/day, respectively; n = 294 for risperidone; n = 114 for haloperidol; n = 144 for ziprasidone; and n = 561 for placebo. Treatment with iloperidone 10-16 mg/day or 20-24 mg/day was associated with significantly improved BPRSd, PANSS-T, PANSS-P, and PANSS-N scores versus treatment with placebo. When only patients with schizophrenia were included (n = 1941), the pattern of results was essentially unchanged. The active controls confirmed assay sensitivity. Across all iloperidone dose groups, the incidences of extrapyramidal disorders and akathisia were similar to those observed with placebo. AEs for which the frequency was greater for iloperidone than placebo and for which the 95% confidence interval for number needed to harm did not contain infinity were dizziness, dry mouth, somnolence, nasal congestion, fatigue, sedation, and tachycardia; in general, for these AEs, frequency was higher with higher doses, resulting in a lower number needed to harm.
Consistent with product labeling, iloperidone 10-16 mg/day or 20-24 mg/day demonstrated significant improvement over placebo on BPRSd and PANSS-T scores, as well as on PANSS-P and PANSS-N subscale scores over 6 weeks of treatment in patients with schizophrenia and in the ITT population, which includes patients with schizoaffective disorder. Iloperidone did not differ from placebo in terms of extrapyramidal disorders and akathisia.
仅通过一项注册研究很难确定一种抗精神病药物的疗效和耐受性特征。因此,我们进行了一项分析,对四项汇总的短期(4 - 6周)III期研究进行事后分析,这些研究评估了在精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者中,伊潘立酮与安慰剂的疗效对比。
患者水平的数据来自四项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照及活性对照的多中心试验,研究对象为年龄在18 - 65岁的精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者。将伊潘立酮4 - 8mg/天、10 - 16mg/天和20 - 24mg/天(均每日两次给药)与安慰剂进行比较。用于分析敏感性的活性对照包括利培酮4 - 8mg/天、氟哌啶醇15mg/天和齐拉西酮160mg/天。感兴趣的结局指标为简明精神病评定量表(衍生版)(BPRSd)、阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)总分(PANSS - T)、PANSS阳性(PANSS - P)和PANSS阴性(PANSS - N)分量表评分从基线到终点的变化。基于意向性治疗(ITT)人群的末次观察结转法,进行协方差分析(将治疗和研究作为因素,基线作为协变量),以比较伊潘立酮治疗组与安慰剂组之间的变化。耐受性结局通过自发报告的不良事件(AE)获得,并计算了每种抗精神病药物相对于安慰剂在总体人群中的伤害所需人数。
ITT人群包括分裂情感性障碍和精神分裂症患者(N = 2401):伊潘立酮4 - 8mg/天、10 - 16mg/天和20 - 24mg/天组分别为n = 370、n = 494和n = 424;利培酮组为n = 294;氟哌啶醇组为n = 114;齐拉西酮组为n = 144;安慰剂组为n = 561。与安慰剂治疗相比,伊潘立酮10 - 16mg/天或20 - 24mg/天治疗使BPRSd、PANSS - T、PANSS - P和PANSS - N评分显著改善。仅纳入精神分裂症患者(n = 1941)时,结果模式基本不变。活性对照证实了分析的敏感性。在所有伊潘立酮剂量组中,锥体外系疾病和静坐不能的发生率与安慰剂组相似。伊潘立酮发生率高于安慰剂且伤害所需人数的95%置信区间不包含无穷大的AE有头晕、口干、嗜睡、鼻充血、疲劳、镇静和心动过速;总体而言,对于这些AE,较高剂量时频率更高,导致伤害所需人数更低。
与产品标签一致,在精神分裂症患者以及包括分裂情感性障碍患者的ITT人群中,伊潘立酮10 - 16mg/天或20 - 24mg/天在治疗6周时,在BPRSd和PANSS - T评分以及PANSS - P和PANSS - N分量表评分方面均显示出相对于安慰剂有显著改善。伊潘立酮在锥体外系疾病和静坐不能方面与安慰剂无差异。